Mr Gogolak
Noé Pamarot
1) This is true. But I think that was also true when we were really good last season. And when Conte has been successful in the past. Very few teams play a 3-4-3 these days, but I don't think it's an outdated formation.
Pretty much every manager these days will tell you that formations don't matter as much as patterns of play and specific instructions. 3-4-3 isn't my cup of tea, but it could work. Ironically, I think Conte shot himself in the foot with Porro as he was onto something until the City game.
Royal's lack of end product gives him a more defensive mindset. Against City, that allowed Dier to press much higher with Royal, Romero and Davies covering up. It worked pretty well, I thought. Unfortunately, Porro seems pretty inept defensively and Perisic offers very little in that department either. Add to that a couple of uninspiring performances from Fraser and it's back to square one to figure out our defensive shape. It's a shame because it would have been interesting to see a second game in a row with the same players.
One option would be to drop Perisic to accomodate Porro on the right-hand side but that leaves us with even more problems in our back three, since Davies is the best option defensively. I suspect Conte will go for a more defense-minded duo in midfield but I'm not sure that's the best solution. It's odd when you think that pretty much everyone has been crying for a Royal upgrade and when we finally get one, it creates more problems than it solves.