For me, the narrative is, (and it does appear to be a pattern), where posters focus only on a narrow part (negative) of what happened in his final 12 months, rather than looking at the context and the big picture of what he had achieved. They also conveniently dismiss the achievements of those 12 months some say 18 months , (they were just cup games, we limped into the top 4), achievements which were still greater for Spurs than anything since or even before him in the PL. It' means that some fans can justify to themselves that it was ok to sack him before he had been given an opportunity to rebuild.
Arteta who spent more money than Poch finished 8th twice and the Arsenal board still kept faith in him. Poch at least deserved one bad season of finishing outside the top 4. It was a bad call by ENIC, and it's not like we have been better since even with 2 so called world class managers and spending shackles loosened. The lesson is careful what you wish for
As for the record amount spent for zero change, he didn't really get enough time to work with those transfers did he? And fwiw Ndombele looked like a really exciting prospect in those first few games he played under Poch.