• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Transfer thread

I like to think Bergvall is staying as very good back up alternatives for Tonali and Fernandes with Gray and we are looking to sell Bentancur and Sarr, that would make more sense to me.......I know I know I am not RDZ and what he thinks is all that matters.......
Its an interesting conundrum. They would definitely be my locked in 4 CMs

Personally I would keep a 5th (Bentancur as the experienced mentor, like Davies is to the defence). I'd also keep Sarr over Gallagher, if we want a versatile runner to be our second #10 in Simons' absence

But ultimately i would accept losing Bentancur and Sarr if it's the price for keeping Bergvall. We could perhaps promote Abbott to 5th CM then?
 
I like to think Bergvall is staying as very good back up alternatives for Tonali and Fernandes with Gray and we are looking to sell Bentancur and Sarr, that would make more sense to me.......I know I know I am not RDZ and what he thinks is all that matters.......
He's not that good a backup, both are passers and he isn't but I agree with moving Bentancur on if possible and replacing with a durable player of the same type who is a bit better with the ball. Could be journey man type.
 
We can't actually sign anyone else without offloading players unless we want a Chelsea situation, we've got way to many players on the books to all be named in the PL squad.
 
He's not that good a backup, both are passers and he isn't but I agree with moving Bentancur on if possible and replacing with a durable player of the same type who is a bit better with the ball. Could be journey man type.
I can see a world where Bent/Sarr/Berg leave and we buy in one more.
 
He's not that good a backup, both are passers and he isn't but I agree with moving Bentancur on if possible and replacing with a durable player of the same type who is a bit better with the ball. Could be journey man type.

He is better than the other two and offers a different dynamic IMO. He also has a future which Sarr and Bentancur don't IMO. Ultimately in the table of who would be going first, it would be Sarr then Bentancur before Bergvall
 
He is better than the other two and offers a different dynamic IMO. He also has a future which Sarr and Bentancur don't IMO. Ultimately in the table of who would be going first, it would be Sarr then Bentancur before Bergvall
I don't know if I agree he's better than them tbh. He doesn't really stand out to me but then I am biased towards passing midfielders, non passers are a bit of a muchness for me. Their other qualities need to really be exceptional and I don't see that with Bergvall. As an allrounder I think Sarr offers more but he's also been disappointing when it comes down to it.
 
I don't know if I agree he's better than them tbh. He doesn't really stand out to me but then I am biased towards passing midfielders, non passers are a bit of a muchness for me. Their other qualities need to really be exceptional and I don't see that with Bergvall. As an allrounder I think Sarr offers more but he's also been disappointing when it comes down to it.

I think there is alot more in his locker given his profile before he joined. I don't think the last 2 years have been the basis for seeing the best of that, especially as he is still only 20.
 
Back