i was never arguing whether they "had enough (defenders) or not". my point was simply that their perceived lack of defenders (number wise) was being overplayed by the media, and was therefore being given too much signifance when considering their "poor form" (again, perceived).
i was pointing out that the players that had covered for their main 2 centre backs performed well, and that to attribute much blame on this issue was a red herring. and then i gave examples of other teams, notably chelsea to who you could draw some comparisons to.
if arsenal desperately "needed" a defender, why didnt they have one more at the start of the season? from looking at how wenger acts in the transfer market over the past few years, its obvious that he only buys players when he beleives that there is sufficient value to be had (as opposed to simply filling gaps in the team). i think thats why he bought the new brazilian cb. and thats also why he has many attacking players too. basically, he beleives that these guys represent good value. if he couldnt find a defender that was "good-value" i doubt he wouldve bought one this window.
i was pointing out that the players that had covered for their main 2 centre backs performed well, and that to attribute much blame on this issue was a red herring. and then i gave examples of other teams, notably chelsea to who you could draw some comparisons to.
if arsenal desperately "needed" a defender, why didnt they have one more at the start of the season? from looking at how wenger acts in the transfer market over the past few years, its obvious that he only buys players when he beleives that there is sufficient value to be had (as opposed to simply filling gaps in the team). i think thats why he bought the new brazilian cb. and thats also why he has many attacking players too. basically, he beleives that these guys represent good value. if he couldnt find a defender that was "good-value" i doubt he wouldve bought one this window.