would your point not stand if arsenal go onto win the tie?
It probably would, but i prefer like today when they have gone out for the fifth year running after having a VERY favorable draw that then leaves you with very little wriggle room
I await your excuses for Wenger and Arsene as usual...don't forget to mention 80M spent on Ozil and Sanchez in the last two years when giving yourexcusesexplanations..
i guess ill be getting a lot of abuse from people who WRONGLY believe that im an arsenal fan
the explanation is simple. its football: sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. sometimes you can beat teams with players on more money than yours (ie. man utd vs arsenal the other week), and sometimes you can even lose to teams with players on less money than yours (ie. tonight).
...And sometimes in the case of Arsenal and Arsene Wenger you can spend loads of money and still underacheive relative to that spend...see Arsenal's last five years in CL...
So sometimes success is more to do with ability and managerial acumen: something that Wenger clearly lacks when it comes to the crunch (and net spend comparisons now confirm)
5 years of champions league knockout football is way too small of a sample size to draw the type of conclusion that you have done. and also depending on how judge relative success, i think there are very strong arugments to suggest that arsenal's champions league campaign as a whole of the past 5 years, hasnt been too bad given that they have always made it into the 2nd round.
must be boring every year, same old same old.. atleast with spurs, you get a ride.
Lol are you Wenger in disguise? For the money the spend now and the wages they pay you think last 16 for five years straight is good enough? So Arsenal should achieve what Shaktar, Basle and Schalke achieve?
Now I know you are a Arsenal fan/Wenger apologist!!
Now I know you are aArsenal fan/Wenger apologist!!
i guess ill be getting a lot of abuse from people who WRONGLY believe that im an arsenal fan
the explanation is simple. its football: sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. sometimes you can beat teams with players on more money than yours (ie. man utd vs arsenal the other week), and sometimes you can even lose to teams with players on less money than yours (ie. tonight).
sign me up for the boring please
better to be inside the tent tinkleing out
Lol are you Wenger in disguise? For the money the spend now and the wages they pay you think last 16 for five years straight is good enough? So Arsenal should achieve what Shaktar, Basle and Schalke achieve?
thing is, there is at least 10 clubs paying double the wages they pay
Yes but, Wenger has lost 20 years on the trot in the Champions League. He always loses and never wins, that's the problem.
i think id rather not.
fail to sign players in positions you need, get raped by the top clubs, do well against crud, be happy with finishing fourth every year, going long spells without any type of silverware, make up the numbers in europe because no where near good enough to be one of the top 10 clubs in the comp.
atleast we have a laugh every week.
A bit below par?over the past 5 years, they maybe have performed a bit below par (fwiw, im not sure they actually have), but thats not so unusual given the knockout nature of the competition, and the lack of any real sample size.
whereas we...
fail to sign players in the positions we need, get raped by top and bottom clubs, don't do well against anyone, are happy with EL, haven't won a major trophy since 1984, make up the numbers in the secondary European tournament?
things are what they are and we are certainly improving but let's not forget that for a large part of our history we were much higher up the ladder than we are now