Gamechanger
He was ****ing awful when he came on.
The team lost the balance and shape it had before hand. Luckily Eriksen rescued us.
Admittedly I was looking after my little one (14 months and she's just learnt to walk so it takes some attention) so I couldn't really concentrate on the game yesterday, but did he really do anything that wrong/badly?? I don't remember him doing anything of note, but equally I can't really remember him cheaply giving the ball away either, which is a pretty standard performance for someone who's just come on as a sub late on in a game.
Well he's meant to be a Brazilian goal scoring midfielder.... he came on, various times did not show for the ball or create an angle so that he could be found with a pass. Took 4 touches to to get it out of his feet when Mason would need one and also jumped out of a challenge towards the end. The guy is shocking and a complete coward to boot
Admittedly I was looking after my little one (14 months and she's just learnt to walk so it takes some attention) so I couldn't really concentrate on the game yesterday, but did he really do anything that wrong/badly?? I don't remember him doing anything of note, but equally I can't really remember him cheaply giving the ball away either, which is a pretty standard performance for someone who's just come on as a sub late on in a game.
He did what he had to do, slowed the game down and saw out time. As for Livermore, if charlie Adam or lee cater ole had made that tackle we would been burning effigies of them. To make a tackle like that on a booking and already down to 10 men shows rank stupidity.
Sitting on my porcelain throne using Fapatalk
Admittedly I was looking after my little one (14 months and she's just learnt to walk so it takes some attention) so I couldn't really concentrate on the game yesterday, but did he really do anything that wrong/badly?? I don't remember him doing anything of note, but equally I can't really remember him cheaply giving the ball away either, which is a pretty standard performance for someone who's just come on as a sub late on in a game.
Admittedly I was looking after my little one (14 months and she's just learnt to walk so it takes some attention) so I couldn't really concentrate on the game yesterday, but did he really do anything that wrong/badly?? I don't remember him doing anything of note, but equally I can't really remember him cheaply giving the ball away either, which is a pretty standard performance for someone who's just come on as a sub late on in a game.
No, he really wasn't that bad at all. He had about ten minutes and the stick he is getting in this thread is absolutely ridiculous.
No, he really wasn't that bad at all. He had about ten minutes and the stick he is getting in this thread is absolutely ridiculous.
Nothing new in that though, there always has to be a target for some fans.
Nothing new in that though, there always has to be a target for some fans.
OK - next time he plays watch the following.
1. if he shows or makes an angle in the midfield to take the pass (picking the ball up 5 yards from our centre half does not count)
2. If he is able to use the ball with one touch or even two.
3. If he shows for the ball if under pressure from a marker.
4. If he is able to use the ball intelligently and bravely when in possession.
6. If he is able to look over his shoulder to see what is going on when receiving the ball facing our goal (what you are taught to do as 10 year olds)
The fact of the matter is that he has never shown any of this and for 17m that is simply unacceptable. Any premier league midfielder who is scared to get on the ball deserves everything he gets. Awful.
The argument isnt about whether he does any of what you've listed or not - which is open to debate by the way. The consensus is he's not good enough, fine.
But when he comes on and does nothing wrong, just a standard last 10 minute sub performance why is there a need to attempt to find things to criticise him about? Pointless....