There are multiple factors for that happening. Only some of those are within the control of the manager.
It may be good to try to rectify that through short term solutions. It may be bad.
Dig out whatever poor stat from the first couple of years from Arteta or Klopp. Should they have tried to fix that with a short term solution, or should they have worked towards slightly longer term solutions? Solutions that included sticking with the overall system, making good transfer decisions and getting the pieces in place for the system to work.
There are concerns about the longevity of Conte for various reasons. But the only thing he should do imo is work towards improving the team within his system.
Everone seemingly wants a long term strategy. Up to the point where there's a relatively short term drop in form. Then we need to fix that short term or find a new long term strategy. If we follow that we never get to the mid to long term benefits.
Most of the time a good mid to long term strategy will result in shorter term issues. As will a poor long term plan. As will ultimately a short term focus.
Spurs fans don't want a long term strategy, and it's time for people to admit that
- There are people who think the stadium should have already made up the money for us to compete with Arsenal and United overnight
- These are the same people "represented" by the THST who feel the club is in a crisis situation when we were 5th, 2 points of 3rd and needed an emergency response from the club
- Arteta is the subject of a whole other conversation, my opinion is he was an appointment to quiet fans (just like if we went back to Poch now, but with less pedigree), Arsenal has been in downfall for over a decade now (so expectations were less, they have been out of CL for 6 years, for context we have been in 5 of last 7 CLs but somehow Spurs is a brickshow), a shadow of the Wenger era side, something papered over by a couple of trophies and this season's run. I think Arsenal has paid off most of their debt (it's been 14 years since stadium), the owners have put some money in and they have improved and will be in the top 4 conversation again, but I think anyone who believes they are truly challenging the elite even next year is fudging deluded.
- Klopp, from the beginning you could see what he was trying to do, the football was at least fun to watch, he had proven he could do it in a similar type of situation.
This is the Conte problem
- It's hard to see what he wants to do (is it really nothing more than getting WB's to swing a cross in? where does the defense come from?)
- Even if it is successful, is it going to be like watching paint dry every fudging game?
- Does it help the club if we abandon things like youth/promising players?
- Will he ever embrace the club and get fans to feel like he's here, he's part of us, or will always be him doing poor little Spurs a favor?
Klopp, Arteta, Pep embrace their clubs, they don't question the club (Klopp complains about budgets all the time, in the right context "we" can't compete in certain markets without bricking on the club), they get the fans on their side. Conte is being used by fans/THST/media to create even more divisions, to make the atmosphere even worse.
That's why I really no longer see how Conte works, I think the clubs knows it as well, it's what is the exit strategy from here