• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

OMT - Tottenham Hotspur vs PSG

Well if anything it will come down to money
We are happy buying right now players IMO if we can afford them
Eze is my priority because he plays left and central… is more proven and cheaper and is a better player imo all round
Savio is the better dribbler, better combinational player and for games like today would be better at keeping the ball in tight and wider spaces. Eze is more direct, more of a real threat and also still a dribbler but Savio is significantly younger hand had a higher ceiling, Eze is pretty much already there whereas Savio has space to grow.
 
I think everyone is being a tad harsh on Tel, he is only a young lad and you lot are using him as a scape ggoat already. I’m not his biggest fan but come on chaps, he is a young lad. He is going to get enough stick on social media he doesn’t need it from a forum that i feel is full of respected Spurs fans.
I agree nobody should be getting cussed. But Moore. Berg and Gray are younger than Tel. And have showed more. Even Oderbert. The kids who scored in Europa. Scarlett etc.

I hope he gets better but I'm not enthused
 
He has earned that start
But solanke IMO was only ineffective because of fitness
Christ he is the best pressing striker in the country
Yeah I think its likely to be rustiness with Solanke but the energy, system and control we had in the game just died on its a** when he and Tel came on upfront too. Kudus and Richarlison are great outlets in a counter attacking system it has to be said. There is an element of PSG just being a top drawer side and were always going to have their moment. Their moment came when we were knackered and taken our best players off and in contrast their subs livened them up
 
Savio is the better dribbler, better combinational player and for games like today would be better at keeping the ball in tight and wider spaces. Eze is more direct, more of a real threat and also still a dribbler but Savio is significantly younger hand had a higher ceiling, Eze is pretty much already there whereas Savio has space to grow.
Savio may grow
He may not
That’s the gamble
Eze dictates the game and does it everywhere on the pitch
Him being found by bentacur or Pahlhina would be madness
We would have the ability to just keep the ball for once which Frank needs against a lot of sides imo
Savio is more explosive and is a winger ultimately
 
Yeah I think it’s likely to be rustiness with Solanke but the energy, system and control we had in the game just died on its a** when he and Tel came on upfront too. Kudus and Richarlison are great outlets in a counter attacking system it has to be said.
The key change was Paulina
He was covering that space on the edge of the area
Richy and Kudus were already broken
They were all immense
 
Savio may grow
He may not
That’s the gamble
Eze dictates the game and does it everywhere on the pitch
Him being found by bentacur or Pahlhina would be madness
We would have the ability to just keep the ball for once which Frank needs against a lot of sides imo
Savio is more explosive and is a winger ultimately
To Dare is to Do !!
Lets go get both
 
I'd never seen him prior to our interest and having watched a couple of scouting videos in Jan i had the opinion he was very much a work in progress player and not an elite prospect by any measure. I was not keen on signing him after his loan spell but realise that was an opinion based on not much evidence - the club signed him and so he needs to be given the time now to show what he can do.
This is basically my view on him. I didn't signing him made sense but there are some who see something in him and we've signed him now so let's see what he can do.
 
Savio is the better dribbler, better combinational player and for games like today would be better at keeping the ball in tight and wider spaces. Eze is more direct, more of a real threat and also still a dribbler but Savio is significantly younger hand had a higher ceiling, Eze is pretty much already there whereas Savio has space to grow.
Eze has the vision for a great pass and is a better finisher IMHO. But Savio is probably more attainable.
 
He was the cheap option over Raya. It shows.

Doesn't mean he's bad - I think he's a perfectly serviceable keeper. But that's about the extent of it - he's not a Lloris, or even a Gomes with the ability to make wonder saves out of nowhere. He's a slightly shakier Friedel, able to make better saves but worse at commanding his box.
nice to see you back. did you take a break from the site?
 
Disappointed about tonights result but not in a negative way at all. I'm only disappointed as we came so close to have the bragging rights.

We were very good tonight. Frank's attention to detail and his ability to extract the best out of his squad was very noticeable. PSG, as the best team in Europe, were run close. They won the penalty lottery.

The best example I can give is Danso's throw. I didn't even notice under Ange that Danso had that monster throw in him. Even though he was selected in that RCB/RB role he was out there on the left wing launching throws into their penalty spot and they were creating havoc. Frank had switched things around for these moves so our throw-ins were like corners. It is this type of coaching that I appreciate as a fan.

The hybrid 4/5 at the back was so effective that we had 2 of the world's most skilful players subbed off the pitch in the second half.

I hope the optimism now builds in the fan base.
 
Savio may grow
He may not
That’s the gamble
Eze dictates the game and does it everywhere on the pitch
Him being found by bentacur or Pahlhina would be madness
We would have the ability to just keep the ball for once which Frank needs against a lot of sides imo
Savio is more explosive and is a winger ultimately
Yah, but Kulu will eventually return and then we have Eze and Kulu for the middle. Great options of course but the left is still lacking. Whereas adding Savio gets us a quality left winger and assuming we don't bring in say El Khanous Kulu will eventually return. So is rather have Savio for left and Kuku for the middle than Tel/Odobert for the left and Kuku/Eze in the middle.

I know you're gonna respond with Eze being able to play out wide and sure he can but not to the level we want really. Like you say he dictates, his natural game is that if an AM not a winger. There's a reason we are looking at Savio for width and Eze for the centre.
 
nice to see you back. did you take a break from the site?

Thanks mate - I did take a break last year. Not just GG, online in general. Kept an eye on everyone here, but otherwise refrained from pitching in.

Didn't know how deep I was in a spiral of online misery until I did - and once I stepped away, I realized so much of what I was getting angry about online didn't matter.

I'd like to think (and hope) I'm a bit less angry about everything now. :)
 
Back