I would wet myself in joy if they went back to King clown!Dalglish is available isn't he?
It wouldn't surprise me if Brendan turned up at Bayern or Real. Huge talent, just out of his depth at victims.
Its not often the biggest job in football becomes available. Klopp, Ancelotti, Guardiola, they all want it.
Mourinho probably feels hes done enough in his career to warrant a chance at Anfield. Not for me.
from RAWK
I think that Rodgers has his strengths but his weaknesses are glaring. He has been pretty poor in the transfer market at victims and his inability to settle on a formation has been fatal. He is a manager who would be far better off working under a DoF.
I wonder whether the merry-go-round will turn, and we'll see Mou at victims and Ancellotti back at Chel53a?? Can't help thinking that Chel53a see Ancellotti as their 'banker' back-up... not sure Klopp will actually like the challenge inherent with victims at the moment... an imbalanced squad, and even with money, a challenge to bring enough of the 'right' players in without CL guarantees, and the need to offload misfits from the roster...
but he has been working under a transfer committee who have been giving him a load of dud names to choose from....there is a lot he can be blamed for, but victims and their obsession with moneyball signings scrutinized by the committee need to take the majority of the blame for the wasted money
Did the money ball committee expect him to constantly play players out of position? Since Suarez left Rodgers hasn't known his best formation or best starting X1. This weekend he was still experimenting with 3 at the back. He was sussed out and ran out of options.
but he has been working under a transfer committee who have been giving him a load of dud names to choose from....there is a lot he can be blamed for, but victims and their obsession with moneyball signings scrutinized by the committee need to take the majority of the blame for the wasted money
Whilst I understand that politically it wouldn't be wise to veto every suggestion made by the committee, but he must have had some input, some say? He must have made suggestions that were agreed, even if it were in player type rather than name.
He was part of the committee so he shares accountability imo. He's certainly happy to take the credit when his wonderful, world class group of supremely talented youngsters actually managed to occasionally score more than they conceded so his hands are as dirty as Ayre's, Henry's and whoever else was in the meetings when it comes to the failures.
£29m Firmino can't get a game. £20m Markovic on loan. £20m Lovren good for the knacker's yard, double digits on Origi, Allen, Borini and Illori. It's a shambles.
Yes, but if Rodgers considered Benteke unsuitable, all he has to do is say what you just wrote. Would the committee decide to spend £30 million on a player who the manager says can''t play his system? It's one thing going for youngsters when you see potential and value, splashing £30m on an unsuitable player is rather against the Moneyball ethos.
I like Klopp's rock and roll pasona. But not sure he is a top top manager his Dortmund side was unique and fell apart when Lewandowski departed rather like victims did when Suarez left . Will be an interesting time for victims.