• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Wilson Odobert

Raziel said:
It will be interesting if the setup changes for who we play

Against Everton, they probably had to cover/adapt for both Wilson and Deki, both will try to get past their man with some regularity, even if they fail the fact that they will do it over and over means the opposition will need to provide cover, cover means space for other players like Son and Maddison or even a midfielder coming in late (Biss).

Having someone who doesn't just look at the low block and try to draw them out with a passing sequence is a huge add to the squad.
Click to expand...
I hope we do. We have the options and variety within the squad now. And it's a good way to rotate.

Will be interesting to see what we do against Saudi Sportswashing Machine. For me if Solanke isn't ready to start Odobert would be a natural starter. But perhaps with Sarr in midfield instead of Kulusevski for better cover for defensive transitions.
 
braineclipse said:
I hope we do. We have the options and variety within the squad now. And it's a good way to rotate.

Will be interesting to see what we do against Saudi Sportswashing Machine. For me if Solanke isn't ready to start Odobert would be a natural starter. But perhaps with Sarr in midfield instead of Kulusevski for better cover for defensive transitions.
Click to expand...

I would not leave out Kulusevski, his work rate and passing are important to the team and he's the most likely midfielder to score.
 
K.D.D.D.D.Soc said:
I would not leave out Kulusevski, his work rate and passing are important to the team and he's the most likely midfielder to score.
Click to expand...
I agree that he adds some really important things to our team. But playing him in the 8 role, total of 5 mainly attacking players in him, Maddison and 3 forward players is a really attacking setup. Almost ridiculously so. Even though they work hard all of them.

Ange is a really attacking manager. But even he last season never started with that kind of lineup. Doing so away against Saudi Sportswashing Machine may very well be good, but it's worth remembering just how attacking that is.
 
Finney Is Back said:
We’ve lost two subs.
Click to expand...


Possibly understating it - If Richy / Solanke is out then we're one knock away from Spon being back at CF plus Wilson being one of the few who can get past a man. How competitive the squad is as a whole is pretty key and subs do indeed make up a big part of it

It's a fair bit of money on a youngster, going by Ange's selections + thoughts Wilson definitely wasn't just one for the future. It's very annoying to have lost him for the foreseeable... Especially when it looks like we could do with a bit of creativity / attacking inspiration from somewhere.
 
people need to understand that when teams sit deep, like many have done against us, we have been toothless mainly because we don't have a 'tricky' type winger to try and surpass the deep block.

By losing Odobert, we're stuck with one type of winger like Brennan who needs to be played into space, which is lacking if the team sit deep.

Massive option lost for us with him out...
 
Diamond Lights said:
people need to understand that when teams sit deep, like many have done against us, we have been toothless mainly because we don't have a 'tricky' type winger to try and surpass the deep block.

By losing Odobert, we're stuck with one type of winger like Brennan who needs to be played into space, which is lacking if the team sit deep.

Massive option lost for us with him out...
Click to expand...

My thoughts as well, he is something different from our other wide players and gave us a different way of attacking. Early days i know for him but he looks like he has the ability to dribble pass defenders.
 
spurspinter1 said:
Possibly understating it - If Richy / Solanke is out then we're one knock away from Spon being back at CF plus Wilson being one of the few who can get past a man. How competitive the squad is as a whole is pretty key and subs do indeed make up a big part of it

It's a fair bit of money on a youngster, going by Ange's selections + thoughts Wilson definitely wasn't just one for the future. It's very annoying to have lost him for the foreseeable... Especially when it looks like we could do with a bit of creativity / attacking inspiration from somewhere.
Click to expand...
If Solanke is injured than Lankshear can come in. Richarlison has been injured for about 40% of his time at Spurs it is nothing new and probably the reason why the club brought in Solanke to replace him as first choice.


Also not convinced that Wilson is really much better than our other wide players at beating his opponent one on one: Hr has lots of potential but is far from being a first choose player for Spurs. As I said before, we have lost two subs.
 
Finney Is Back said:
If Solanke is injured than Lankshear can come in. Richarlison has been injured for about 40% of his time at Spurs it is nothing new and probably the reason why the club brought in Solanke to replace him as first choice.


Also not convinced that Wilson is really much better than our other wide players at beating his opponent one on one: Hr has lots of potential but is far from being a first choose player for Spurs. As I said before, we have lost two subs.
Click to expand...

Okay 👍
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back