Mulletperm
Dean Austin
Which knob has named their team the Hairy Wookies? I'll bloody end you!
Sorry mate, that's me. My nickname 'in real life' has been Wookie for the past 20 or so years, and that's the name I use for my Fantasy Footy teams.
Which knob has named their team the Hairy Wookies? I'll bloody end you!
Sorry mate, that's me. My nickname 'in real life' has been Wookie for the past 20 or so years, and that's the name I use for my Fantasy Footy teams.
Sky Sports @SkySports
England midfielder Gareth Barry has been ruled out of Euro 2012, the FA has confirmed
Henderson it is then. Get in!!
Sky Sports @SkySports
England midfielder Gareth Barry has been ruled out of Euro 2012, the FA has confirmed
Henderson it is then. Get in!!
I do not think there is much difference between Redknapp or Hodgson in what they have achieved, the main difference (and the reason why Hodgson got the job and Redknapp had no chance) is that Hodgson has shown with Fulham and WBA that he can organise a team better ( ie tactics); If England are ever going to achieve any success with the poor players we have then we have to have a line up that will play to a plan and under Redknapp they will not happen.
Motivator he may be but a tactical manager never, the same thing would have happened as it did with KK and that is why i was always convinced that the FA would never give Redknapp the job.
Barry missed out due to a stomach injury.
He must be gutted.
you could argue that with international teams during qualifying having so little build up time to matches that have a motivator rather than a tactics manager is a good thing. Everyone would say that cappelo was a tactics manager and it never worked with him. At the top level the players should be talented and able to grasp tactical changes quickly. I still beleive that Redknapp was made for the England Job, he would have made players feel happy and able to express themselves, instead of them crapping themselves every time they pull on a 3 lions shirt. The down side for harry is that he would not have implemented any system to work through the ranks. But I would argue Roy and is 4-4-2 is not either.
he has replaced him with Jagielka
Going in to a tournament, the last thing needed is another pre season. You need rested and fresh players.
76%win average ( higher then the manager who won us the world cup) would say different.
I take your point, but when it mattered we were awful. And also a lot of wins were in Friendlies which mean almost nothing. Plus the way we played under him was dire no matter the results we were getting.
I take your point, but when it mattered we were awful. And also a lot of wins were in Friendlies which mean almost nothing. Plus the way we played under him was dire no matter the results we were getting.
Lies, damned lies and statistics?
Capello failed to address the imbalance in the team caused by shoe horning both Gerrard and Lampard into the same XI. The second he did that he failed as England manager imo. We played some absolutely turgid football during his reign, absolutely no new direction either on the current squad or the future of English football (not that you can level that at him, but as a team, the FA and coaches have completely fudged up imo).
International football died for me around 2002/03, I've had practically no interest since in England and prefer to watch other teams. I was hoping Roy would change that but the second his squad was released you could see it would just be more of the same. I'll wait quietly we get the next, next England manager.
Statistics are brilliant for looking back at things that have happened.
It's much harder to justify using them to prove what will happen in the future...
Absolutely right. In this case, we can use statistics to tell us that Capello won a commendable amount of games in friendlies and against lower quality teams in qualifiers, but ultimately could never get a team to beat a "peer" in competition.