braineclipse
Terry Dyson
To be honest one of the things that is wrong with football today is that a lot of fans are obessed ( not saying you are)with formations and many good points are lost in the focus on them. At the end of the day its players ( and their strengths and weaknesses) that matter and the main problem with the two of Mason and Betaleb is that neither of them have the a good defensive awareness of tracking runners and leaving to much space behind them.
I agree that Paulinho is not a defensive player but the fact that he looked better doing it against Burnley then either Mason or Bentaleb did/have done says a lot about the problems we have there at the present time.
I appreciate the "not saying you are" addition to that as I really don't think I am obsessed with formations. I argued based on what you said, because you said we had "an extra man in there" which I saw as you referring to a change in formation? I then argued that it wasn't necessarily a change in formation and could be described with different numbers/names.
I agree that it's more about player strengths and weaknesses. Paulinho effectively replaced Townsend in the line-up giving us very different qualities.
I disagree that Paulinho looked better defensively than Mason and Bentaleb against Burnley. He did more to protect them and our team defensively than Townsend has recently though and that helped. In that somewhat more attacking role I think both Mason and Bentaleb would do just as well, if not better, than Paulinho defensively.