Bullet
Andy Thompson
What was that, water-polo? Basketball? Ice hockey?I think that the USA beating the Soivet Union at the Olympics was bigger.
What was that, water-polo? Basketball? Ice hockey?I think that the USA beating the Soivet Union at the Olympics was bigger.
What was that, water-polo? Basketball? Ice hockey?
What were the odds? Was it a one-off match or a 38 game tournament?Miracle on ice, as it was called. Hockey.
What were the odds? Was it a one-off match or a 38 game tournament?
What were the odds? Was it a one-off match or a 38 game tournament?
Absolutely bizarre that people in here were wanting Southampton to win that game.
We are playing them next.
If they have drew or lost that they would have had nothing to play for.
Now they are in a battle for European places.
Yea but honestly I'd much rather us secure title/second/third by winning our games rather than relying on others not winning theirs. We should be looking to finish the season in style. Set a marker now for next season.
Absolutely bizarre is a bit of an overstatement, no? Now we're more likely to keep City behind us, So'ton aren't direct competitors to our league position, which City are.
Absolutely bizarre is a bit of an overstatement, no? Now we're more likely to keep City behind us, So'ton aren't direct competitors to our league position, which City are.
My thinking was that had they played and say drawn we know that a win would secure 2nd and we could have a real good celebration as the players walk round for the their lap of honour. As it is now, unless we get a least a point tomorrow, we wont know if a win will have been good enough next Sunday until we all get home.
Simple. Win tomorrow and beat Soton. Job done.
Absolutely bizarre is a bit of an overstatement, no? Now we're more likely to keep City behind us, So'ton aren't direct competitors to our league position, which City are.
If they had have beat Southampton it would be
Tottenham P35 +39 69 Pts
Emirates Marketing Project P36 +33 67 Pts
Arsenal P36 +25 67 Pts
City play Arsenal next
If you didn't think we can get 4 points from the next 3 games (with Southampton with nothing to play for) you should give up.
This probably belongs in the 'Struggle for 4th' thread (mods, please move it if that is the case), but here we go.
I happen to think that our 3 Monday games in a row at this point in the season is unfair and puts extra pressure on us. For example, if we had played before Leicester at least once and won it would, in my opinion, have put extra pressure on them for their next game. Pressure that I believe would grow as they had to wait the one or two days after our game to play.
I know some of us have debated this before (and like most things there are divergent opinions), but has there ever been a season when the league has been this close when ONE TEAM, and one team only, has been made to play after the leaders three times in a row? I am guessing it's Sky deciding the schedule but I am curious if there has ever been this kind of scheduling before.
COYS!!!!
No not as far as I can remember
There have been seasons when arse and United were going at it when they alternated the games not not like this
We are lie rally public be enemy number 1
There even doing a MOTD special tomo now I'm the hope we don't win
Also, Denmark winning the euro's, a tournament they were not even eligible for.
Greece as well come to think of it.
I was listening to Five Live earlier whilst pruning (hacking at) my apple orchard (5 trees is an orchard, right?).
All the pundits agreed that Leicester winning the title would be the biggest upset in the history of sport, i.e. no individual or team has ever won something as big as the Premier League when starting with odds of 5000-1.
They are probably right... it is like Dagenham winning the FA Cup or Ernie the Eel winning the Olympic swimming, it just doesn't happen.
That is why everyone is saying "I hope they do it". It is nothing to do with Spurs or the Goons or anyone else, it is just that 5000-1 odds against winners are incredibly rare.