Glenda's Legs
Paul Walsh
Well without going into a war and peace answer the simple answer is a fairer one. Hope for the young familys starting off on married life that they will be able to get on the housing ladder which at the moment is not open to a lot of them. For those who need a doctors appoint that they will not have to wait weeks to do so ( that's if there any surgery still open where they live). You will be able to attend a Hospital and not have to wait in corridors on trolly's hoping to see a doctor before its too late.
Parents being able to get their kids into a local school and not have to travel miles to find one. I could go on but you get the picture, the plain truth is the system is not working and one of the reasons is the barriers we face from the EU. I understand those in the City are making shedloads from the EU but they are a minority and are only thinking of themselves. Take Scara i usually do not agree with most of his views and he mine but when he said he was voting remain he did so for one reason, his pocket. Now that is selfish but at least he was being honest unlike a lot of those i have come across who voted remain and excused it with scare stories about what a tragedy it would be/happen if we came out.
I dare say some will disagree with what i have said, it matters not as its what i and many others believe. I started off by saying i was not going to do a war and peace answer so i think its best to finish this.
Your vision for a post-EU United Kingdom is certainly one we would all like to see. I don't think your post was 'war and peace' by any means. I like to hear different points of view. My question could have been posed differently - i.e.what solution to leaving the EU would give you the environment you ideally want?
So for example, would it be:
- Totally out - no single market access (tariffs instead), no freedom of movement, no financial contribution, no EU-imposed rules;
- Single market access, freedom of movement, some financial contribution, limited EU-imposed rules;
- Some other combination that might be realistically achieved.
Would you allow EU immigration to be capped at current levels, or would you look to remove some or all of those here now (or at the time we officially leave)?
Would reducing EU immigration allow us to keep current low levels of unemployment?
Would the expected slow-down in economic growth (accepted to various degrees by economists on both sides of the argument) adversely impact investment in public services such as the NHS and education? Would we have to increase borrowing to sustain current levels of funding?
Are the burdens on the NHS really due to the EU, or does a large part of the problem lie with targets and extra administrative burdens placed on primary healthcare? i.e. would the resource issue we see now really go away in a non-EU world?
There are undoubtedly rich people working in the City who benefit from trading with and selling services into the EU - but this also generates significant wealth for the rest of the UK. What would replace that if 'passporting' of financial services is no longer allowed?
There are loads of questions that one side could ask of the other. I am not trying to catch you or anyone out here. I am genuinely interested, if we are going to change the current set-up, what the alternative might look like.
I voted Remain, but I was very borderline and could have voted the other way if the Leave campaign could have given feasible options to the points above, and others.
Now, I have unintendedly turned this into my own war and peace posting but I would be interested to hear your views, and those of other Leavers, on the points above.