Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Have faith in the players now
The tackle here was incredible. I thought we were done for once he got past Sarr.
It s a better coached and probably a fitter team
Have faith in the players now
The tackle here was incredible. I thought we were done for once he got past Sarr.
It was a bit bizarre this was probably the first (might be wrong) time Porro was fed on the overlap.What a cross for matip's own goal...Richy wasn't going to make it ...but it looked like Veliz (?) at the far post could ...
I think the number of players was causing our players to have some issues.It was a bit bizarre this was probably the first (might be wrong) time Porro was fed on the overlap.
Deki was constantly cutting inside looking to swing a cross...with them squeezed within the lines of the penalty box an overlap, and hence the change of angle for a cross was there for the taking. Same on the other side.
We typically kept doing what we were doing even when they had 11. Our FBs and no 8s pushing into the crowded inside space.
The tackle here was incredible. I thought we were done for once he got past Sarr.
That's half my point though...we train a certain way for when we're playing 11. We kept playing that way when they had 9. It's early days but I thought some alternate thinking/approach might have been needed, especially as the original approach clearly wasn't getting us anywhere.I think the number of players was causing our players to have some issues.
Maddison said you don’t train for that
We as fans think they must….
It was slow play and nothing that was pulling them out of shape as they are already experienced at this
I said to my mate 30 mins to go, the only way we win this is with a Carragher OG. Matip was their best player too after Allison (top top keeper)
The bench didn’t have the options to do a lot more against 8 men parked in the boxThat's half my point though...we train a certain way for when we're playing 11. We kept playing that way when they had 9. It's early days but I thought some alternate thinking/approach might have been needed, especially as the original approach clearly wasn't getting us anywhere.
I'd probably would have replaced Sarr with Veliz earlier,(with 9, their counter attack potential had gone) then overload out wide to get more byline crosses/cutbacks in.
The number of players is a red herring it's no different than facing a park the bus/lowblock team but Liverpool actually having 1 less player than that in a 5-3 formation rather than 5-4
Frustrating, wasn't it. Seemed so obvious that we needed someone to get wide or get to the byline and stretch things and cause more chaos. No point just chipping crosses into Matip and Van Dijk.Deki was constantly cutting inside looking to swing a cross...with them squeezed within the lines of the penalty box an overlap, and hence the change of angle for a cross was there for the taking. Same on the other side.
We typically kept doing what we were doing even when they had 11. Our FBs and no 8s pushing into the crowded inside space.
With the benefit of hindsight I would suggest taking Sarr off, bringing Emerson on to protect against the counter attacks and move Kulu into the middle and Porro to RW for a better overlap. Kulu and Maddison in the centre would have given more passing options as well so two for the price of one.That's half my point though...we train a certain way for when we're playing 11. We kept playing that way when they had 9. It's early days but I thought some alternate thinking/approach might have been needed, especially as the original approach clearly wasn't getting us anywhere.
I'd probably would have replaced Sarr with Veliz earlier,(with 9, their counter attack potential had gone) then overload out wide to get more byline crosses/cutbacks in.
The number of players is a red herring it's no different than facing a park the bus/lowblock team but Liverpool actually having 1 less player than that in a 5-3 formation rather than 5-4
With the benefit of hindsight I would suggest taking Sarr off, bringing Emerson on to protect against the counter attacks and move Kulu into the middle and Porro to RW for a better overlap. Kulu and Maddison in the centre would have given more passing options as well so two for the price of one.
Sent from my XQ-BC72 using Fapatalk
That's half my point though...we train a certain way for when we're playing 11. We kept playing that way when they had 9. It's early days but I thought some alternate thinking/approach might have been needed, especially as the original approach clearly wasn't getting us anywhere.
I'd probably would have replaced Sarr with Veliz earlier,(with 9, their counter attack potential had gone) then overload out wide to get more byline crosses/cutbacks in.
The number of players is a red herring it's no different than facing a park the bus/lowblock team but Liverpool actually having 1 less player than that in a 5-3 formation rather than 5-4
Said something similar in the OMT.
I think we're focused on "plan A" for now, understandable that the players keep doing the same thing. Hoping that as we progress we start mixing it up a bit more when it's needed or advantageous. Both Porro and Udogie can do that overlapping thing for example.
Seems that Ange wants the players to have the freedom to find those solutions. But we're a young team too, so it's understandable that they're not yet at that level where they're finding those when the game conditions change drastically.
I agree.Said something similar in the OMT.
I think we're focused on "plan A" for now, understandable that the players keep doing the same thing. Hoping that as we progress we start mixing it up a bit more when it's needed or advantageous. Both Porro and Udogie can do that overlapping thing for example.
Seems that Ange wants the players to have the freedom to find those solutions. But we're a young team too, so it's understandable that they're not yet at that level where they're finding those when the game conditions change drastically.
Kulu along with Maddison in the centre would have given two possible sources of line breaking passes as well as improved triangle passing options. While still having Porro out wide ready and able to whip in crosses. It would keep the Liverpool defence on its toes as the attack could have been more varied.Or maybe we should have considered playing Kulu down the left flank so he could whip crosses in with his stronger foot.
It's hard to tell
- We laboured against a very well organized two banks of 8 with VVD & Allison playing out of their skins
- We tried to go through the middle too much, logically we should have tried to stretch them more (your point about young team)
That said
- That said, Son & Maddison were still not 100%
- Part of our system is we play the same way/tempo and it tires the opposition into a mistake (late goals will be a feature)
I would say Udogie probably overlaps more than Porro, and Porro's end product is probably slightly better, so we should see it more
Mr Porro has very fast feet and is one of several players we have who is somewhat "press-resistant".
We seem to enjoy playing in tight triangles under pressure close to our own goal but not so much near the opposition's penalty area.