metalgear
Luka Modric
SPURS' RECORD WITHOUT DEMBELE | |
WINS DRAWS DEFEATS WIN RATE LOSS RATE | 1 2 4 14% 57% |
SPURS' RECORD WITH DEMBELE | |
WINS DRAWS DEFEATS WIN RATE LOSS RATE | 15 5 2 68% 9% |
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896/premier-league/2013/03/17/3830855/-
Even from his very first appearance in midfield against Chelsea, it is his defensive qualities that have continually impressed most. Fierce in the tackle and with an intelligent awareness of danger, Dembele's partnership with Brazilian destroyer Sandro, sidelined for the rest of the season, had become arguably the most indomitable and powerful in the division.
It is in this respect that the Belgian is far superior to Modric. In the Croatian's 36 games for Spurs last year, he attempted 56 tackles with 71% success. In just 22 appearances this year, Dembele has already engaged in 67 tackles with 82% success. The Belgian has also won more 50-50s (on the ground and in the air) and has been dribbled past just 12 times compared to Modric’s 32. Tottenham even concede fewer goals when Dembele is on the pitch.
But what Modric lost in bite and tenacity he made up for in vision and creativity. Both players average a pass a minute, but a far higher percentage of the Croatian's passes were forwards (39%) or in the final third (35%) compared to Dembele (22% and 25% respectively). Modric also created nine clear-cut chances (one every 357 minutes) compared to the Belgian's two (one every 881 minutes).
Nice article there comparing Modric and Dembele. Both very good players, but it seems overall that Modric spent more time up front compared to Dembele.