parklane1
Tony Galvin
Worked so hard but his decision making was off today
Spot on
Worked so hard but his decision making was off today
I've been thinking if we should play with two strikers. Kane is best as a striker, but always drops deep. We need a striker who can score 15+ goals a season and wants to stay up in an attacking position, pressing the defenders but not dropping deep. That way, takes the pressure from Kane a bit, and will help us in those games where perhaps Kane isn't quite at it.
The alternative is that Son starts more often as I trust him to score more the I trust our other midfielders to score.
Lol we are winning and playing some cracking stuff at times and some on this thread question lamella and now should think of playing 442 ...
If it aint broke ...
I don't follow. We shouldn't question the team because we're doing well?
Would you not sign anyone this window? If so, what sort of players? Only squad players?
His lack of goal threat and inability to beat a man are real issues, in my opinion.
The reasons are he does like to drop deep and find the space and he can also run with the ball from there, he has a good vision and can spot a pass coming from deep as well.
I think that he is doing it because Poch wants movement from his front four and them swapping positions
Maybe, but its also a part of his natural game and he has always done it. He is getting a deserved reputation as a very good player and I just think if he played behind another player he would be able to become a even better one. ( imo).
Do you ever believe he's going to score? I don't. It's quite a problem if you're playing with one striker, and we're assuming Eriksen starts and is never going to be prolific, and allowances are made for that as, in theory, our playmaker.
Demebele over hit that pass so Lamella had to check, he should also have passed to his right as there were more options and Cattermole was moving to his right all the time leaving the space there
Agree with the first part. But in the X1 without a pause? I think not. We sometimes look like we have all the possession in the world but are creating too little. We have other options available which could offer as much if not more - notably Son at present and maybe Berahino in future.
I also tend to agree with others who think that maybe Eriksen and Lamela might be a bit like Lampard and Gerrard for England. Not synergistic. We sometimes need more of a goal threat against teams who sit back. A Son or Berahino may possibly offer more goals and therefore I certainly don't think Lamela is a shoe in the the X1, certainly not without pause.
Yes I believe he's going to score.
Also. Eriksen is never going to be prolific? How many PL goals in a season to be "prolific" from a wide attacking midfield role in our setup in your opinion?
Lamela is also just as much our playmaker as Eriksen.
Agreed. Not the best decision from Dembele, Lamela did fine by striking it. Should have gotten it on target though and any rebound from the goalie could have been dangerous.
He said currently... And currently Lamela is currently easily in the team head of Son on merit. Son has looked closer to dislodging Eriksen than Lamela.
The big concern i have with Lamela (and I'm a Lamela supporter) is that when he's missing his chances his body shape is often totally wrong. When he missed that break against Sunderland when Dembele played him in his body position was all wrong: it looked awkward, and not like someone who was going to trouble the keeper. For me, that is happening too often. His end product was improving and improving but he's taken a few steps backwards in the past few weeks.
There is just something about the way he shapes to shoot the bothers me. His shooting technique makes me question whether he will really develop into a player who might threaten to pick up 10-15 goals a season, which is what a team with our aspirations requires from some of the forwards playing behind the striker.
I still think his confidence when shooting is a bit lacking. He came here with a huge reputation and 15 goals in 30 league starts for Roma the season before. His messy first season and average second season probably hurt his confidence quite a lot. He's gotten his mojo back in his overall game, but he doesn't have that "I know I'm going to score" confidence of Kane.
I still think his confidence when shooting is a bit lacking. He came here with a huge reputation and 15 goals in 30 league starts for Roma the season before. His messy first season and average second season probably hurt his confidence quite a lot. He's gotten his mojo back in his overall game, but he doesn't have that "I know I'm going to score" confidence of Kane.
He doesn't but then he is playing a very different game here to Roma. He plays now for me like an English player, running winning tackles etc... He reminds me of Milner
Can see Lamela not starting at Palace this weekend, with Son in his place. He's having his best period at Spurs, but still does things that frustrate me.
I like Eriksen and I like Lamela, but I think we'd have a better balanced attack if only one of them played, and a more natural forward occupied the other spot. Chadli, for all his faults, does make the runs of a forward and finishes like one. Son could be a player, going on his performance v Leicester tonight. He can seemingly move and finish like a forward but also play the nice passes of a #10. He also has some pace, which does add another dimension.
Son might be the answer, I don't think Chadli is as he is missing too many aspects of the game to be a Poch player imo.