tommysvr
Simon Davies
Not too many lean into the COVID conspiracy stuff like he did though.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Harry Kane MBE
- Thread starter thfcsteff
- Start date
Not too many lean into the COVID conspiracy stuff like he did though.
Grays_1890
Colin Calderwood
Na I saw it, the deal was done and then he pulled out
Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
Finney Is Back
Luka Modric
It was actually even closer than that. He had signed the deal but then thought twice and asked Spurs if it could be voided. (I think it was) Venables tore up the contract. Le Tiss has since said how grateful he was that we allowed that to happen.
NaijaSpurs
Rafael Van Der Vaart
But seriously, why would Kane want to stay?
Either we get silly money or he'll have to see out his contract. Free transfer to City when they sell Haaland next summer.
glasgowspur
Nayim
No one is offering silly money, so we lower our asking price or he's going nowhere.
Someone will be along to blame him for the shambles at the back in a minute
That’s what I reckon will happen.
paxtonwolf
John White
I could see him doing a 'Teddy Sheringham' but with City.
Goes to City June 2024. Has 2 seasons with them, bags a couple of trophies, comes back to Spurs and sees his career out in midfield with us ending up with Shearer's PL Goal Record
MKSpur
Christian Ziege
I can see Pep holding a grudge over the failed move but if he has to go domestically then this is what I'd hope for.
I'd hate to see him improve a rival for CL and City are out of sight as it is, let alone with Kane.
If we ever got good again he could even do the Bergkamp style cameo where he'd come on for the last 20 and take the tinkle to help see out the game.
That's probably the most realistic scenario and would be hard to blame him
I can't see City wanting him now with Haaland tearing it up, I think in the UK Utd are the only realistic option if Liverpool want to get numbers in they won't spend big.
I don't think there's much value in letting him go, if we get say 80m we'd need to spend 50m at least on a replacement with no guarantee they'd succeed.
I don't think there's much value in letting him go, if we get say 80m we'd need to spend 50m at least on a replacement with no guarantee they'd succeed.
Logical answer is you keep him for one more year (if he won't renew), give the new manager one less problem in his first year and we let him go for wherever his swansong takes him.
Haaland will leave City at the end of next season, so there may be a easy path for everyone.
Bedfordspurs
Arthur Rowe
Why will Haaland leave then?
Agree with your point regarding Kane.
But in terms of Haaland, they have removed the release clause and there is a lot of talk they are tying him up to a new deal. He will be there for longer in all likelihood....
They haven't removed the release clause, they are trying to remove it in the new deal they are supposed to be offering him.
Not according to the Athletic
https://theathletic.com/4425390/2023/04/19/erling-haaland-manchester-city-contract/?amp=1
Not sure how you do that without a new contract
He had/has a release clause at end of year 2 for somewhere between £128M-£150M
The general consensus is he wants Madrid in the long run