tommysvr
Vedran Corluka
Most of them are.
Not too many lean into the COVID conspiracy stuff like he did though.
Most of them are.
Na I saw it, the deal was done and then he pulled outAs posted above. There is a video interview doing the rounds that I saw just a few weeks ago, pretty sure he said we were the only club in for him and he was ready to make the move but his missus wasn't and he chose to stay. I could have misinterpreted it. Will have to see if I can find it again
It was actually even closer than that. He had signed the deal but then thought twice and asked Spurs if it could be voided. (I think it was) Venables tore up the contract. Le Tiss has since said how grateful he was that we allowed that to happen.As posted above. There is a video interview doing the rounds that I saw just a few weeks ago, pretty sure he said we were the only club in for him and he was ready to make the move but his missus wasn't and he chose to stay. I could have misinterpreted it. Will have to see if I can find it again
But seriously, why would Kane want to stay?
No one is offering silly money, so we lower our asking price or he's going nowhere.Either we get silly money or he'll have to see out his contract. Free transfer to City when they sell Haaland next summer.
Thanks Harry just go somewhere where you deserve to play for titles and teams that avidly wish to achieve things.
That’s what I reckon will happen.Either we get silly money or he'll have to see out his contract. Free transfer to City when they sell Haaland next summer.
Either we get silly money or he'll have to see out his contract. Free transfer to City when they sell Haaland next summer.
I can see Pep holding a grudge over the failed move but if he has to go domestically then this is what I'd hope for.I could see him doing a 'Teddy Sheringham' but with City.
Goes to City June 2024. Has 2 seasons with them, bags a couple of trophies, comes back to Spurs and sees his career out in midfield with us ending up with Shearer's PL Goal Record
Either we get silly money or he'll have to see out his contract. Free transfer to City when they sell Haaland next summer.
I can't see City wanting him now with Haaland tearing it up, I think in the UK Utd are the only realistic option if Liverpool want to get numbers in they won't spend big.
I don't think there's much value in letting him go, if we get say 80m we'd need to spend 50m at least on a replacement with no guarantee they'd succeed.
Why will Haaland leave then?Logical answer is you keep him for one more year (if he won't renew), give the new manager one less problem in his first year and we let him go for wherever his swansong takes him.
Haaland will leave City at the end of next season, so there may be an easy path for everyone.
Agree with your point regarding Kane.Logical answer is you keep him for one more year (if he won't renew), give the new manager one less problem in his first year and we let him go for wherever his swansong takes him.
Haaland will leave City at the end of next season, so there may be a easy path for everyone.
They haven't removed the release clause, they are trying to remove it in the new deal they are supposed to be offering him.Agree with your point regarding Kane.
But in terms of Haaland, they have removed the release clause and there is a lot of talk they are tying him up to a new deal. He will be there for longer in all likelihood....
Not according to the AthleticThey haven't removed the release clause, they are trying to remove it in the new deal they are supposed to be offering him.
Not according to the Athletic
https://theathletic.com/4425390/2023/04/19/erling-haaland-manchester-city-contract/?amp=1
Why will Haaland leave then?