SpurMeUp
Gary Stevens
Felix to Chelsea on loan has legs it seems.
Not surprising really. No legs and he’d find it hard to control the ball.
Last edited:
Felix to Chelsea on loan has legs it seems.
£8.8m loan for half a season with no option to buy?????
Better than having to play Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang!
Pitty they are just buying players for him to manage rather than signing players he actually wants.They know what they are doing
Spurs fans will tell you that
All the Chelsea fans I know think they are being batbrick crazy and just throwing money around
Not one Chelsea fan I know wants potter in charge either as he isn’t elite
That club right know is a mess
But they fix it if they stick with him IMO
They have backed him with the recruitment team too
We will never know TBHPitty they are just buying players for him to manage rather than signing players he actually wants.
Amazing in the air apparently, according to nominative determinismHas anyone seen Tete at Lyon via Shaktar?
Seen him linked a few times but I have never seen him play
Got a decent record as an attacking midfielder
An Ndicka-Tete pairing down the left flank might also be embarrassingHas anyone seen Tete at Lyon via Shaktar?
Seen him linked a few times but I have never seen him play
Got a decent record as an attacking midfielder
Neither you or I know what the endgame is for those investors or how they believe they will get there. I was constantly told on here that Roman Abramovich was throwing his money away with his constant investments into Chelsea while pretty much a lone voice on here stating that he would likely turn a very good profit if and when he decided to sell and was proved right even when it was a distressed sale having to be completed very quickly.
All we know at present is that Chelsea have £1.75b of capital as a stipulation of the purchase. I suspect it will take a good number of years for them to burn through that capital. Unfortunately they'll be a big club now until at least the day I die I think.
Always love how they extend the contract first
Boehly and his consortium paid £2.5b for Chelsea, plus a contractual commitment to inject £1.75b of funds. Abramovich wasn't able to profit from the sale due to the sanctions in place.Sorry, how much profit did abramovich make from the sale of chelsea? As far as i'm aware he didn't get a penny. The glazers on the other hand...
Their commitment on the 1.75 doesn’t have a time frame form what I can seeBoehly and his consortium paid £2.5b for Chelsea, plus a contractual commitment to inject £1.75b of funds. Abramovich wasn't able to profit from the sale due to the sanctions in place.
Boehly and his consortium paid £2.5b for Chelsea, plus a contractual commitment to inject £1.75b of funds. Abramovich wasn't able to profit from the sale due to the sanctions in place.
So he did throw his money away. If the rumours are to be believed spurs are valued at £4bn. The telegraph saying qsi are looking to invest £1bn for a 25% stake.
As Finney has pointed out the circumstances of the sale was probably what cost him.
Also sportswashing. He's still alive, if the Chelsea spending helped that it's a pretty decent ROI.
Explain please?So he did throw his money away. If the rumours are to be believed spurs are valued at £4bn. The telegraph saying qsi are looking to invest £1bn for a 25% stake.