nayimfromthehalfwayline
Andy Thompson
No inherited context is being enforced here - you only need half a brain cell to read the thread title
And about two hours to read through 32 pages to see if its still relevant...
No inherited context is being enforced here - you only need half a brain cell to read the thread title
VDV (wing forward left).
think AVB will continiue with the formation or system we played last year..or similar anyway
only difference is the attacking contribution of the wing players.
I believe that a balance between stretching the field and provide numbers in the box is going to be adpoted
therefore wen we have a full squad
back four of walker verty (really starting to see why people like this guy) kaboul (though i would prefer gallas) and BAE
midfield trio of sandro, modric (if not him then i would prefer thudd), siggy ...at the tip
front three of......lennon (wide right)...VDV (wing forward left)...bale (CF ..drifting into the channels)
fudge the striker situation...THAT team rocks!!!!
To be honest mate I think organised pressing and a stronger tactical approach ON TOP OF Harrys set up would indeed be wonderous.
We were small margins from something VERY special, IMO.
i'd be amazed if we managed to press consistently as well as we did in the earlier part of 3 seasons ago when we were dusting teams with the two small men up top in keane and defoe. it didnt keep[ up for the season but for the first like 5 or 6 games it was ever present.
naturally people forget thanks to father time but i remember ...the wonky and PRESSINg from 3 seasons ago brought us a monstrous start to that season.
"strong tactical approach"? grrrrrr....i wont lie, its sweeping vague comments like this that makes me not like AVB, whats this amazing tactical shift that he's going to conjour up that he didnt do at chelsea? i really dont understand what it is thats soo amazing from him tactically..to add "strong" to it just buries me in frustration
but no matter...we will see this grand master plan on saturday...at the very least in paper mache ......doesnt have to be great or even work....i just want to see what he is going to do thats soo different and a significant upgrade on what we were used to when we were breaking records
I'd imagine people aren't expecting the useless wandering Bale from last season, 442's away to Arsenal and not changing it whilst getting murdered. Hopefully we'll have a plan b when 'go out there and play lads' isnt working. Hopefully we'll see the end of the Dawson hoof/long ball to no-one. I'm certainly hoping that we'll have a basic set of identifiable tactics and discernable formations.
No inherited context is being enforced here - you only need half a brain cell to read the thread title
"strong tactical approach"? grrrrrr....i wont lie, its sweeping vague comments like this that makes me not like AVB, whats this amazing tactical shift that he's going to conjour up that he didnt do at chelsea? i really dont understand what it is thats soo amazing from him tactically..to add "strong" to it just buries me in frustration
To be honest mate it was vague, and I certainly wasnt talking about tactical masterclasses week after week.
Possibly made the wrong choice of words.
I was thinking more of greater preparation for matches, attention to detail and more of an over riding system of play. Advancements on what Harry did.
ahh, well then i clearly wasnt addressing you mate
its all those guys that think we are going to be playing sweet technical stuff week in week out......... am telling you its driving me round the bend.
i think you and i both know that Harry had quite a bit of limitations on the tactical front.....but screw me blind if that hasnt raised AVB into stardom before anything has happened
saturday is fast approaching though
i will say this...him trying bale as a forward? inspired
if bale doesnt wander away from the left touchline creating space for the fullback to occupy and increasing our numbers in midfield or on the last defensive line, now and again , infact making it part of his weekly routine...then quite frankly i think AVB is dumb,to put it bluntly
yes the 442 away to arsenal......you say this and somehow i remember it more like 442 up until half time..which was 2-2. then we changed it at half time to a 451 and THEN got completely roasted? is that true or not? i could be wrong but i dont think so. plus its good that you picked one of the few games and probably the worst of harry's tenure.
this plan b thing is getting out of control. can you give me an example of a plan B that you yourself would have liked to have seen?
if cant defend dawson hoofing the ball, i can only assume that its some kind of genetic disposition to MOST footballers that play with 6 foot 6 bean poles, of footballers that play in non technical teams or footballers that play in teams with no urgency or movement.
but i trust you in particular to fair, judging by what i have read of yours you try to be. when AVB has a bad game...kick his ass...when kaboul or verty play long balls ..let AVB have it, its the only way to prove that it isnt a biased thing against harry
Actually i doubt we'll be seeing many hoof balls from verty...i really like him...he's a good footballer
I wasn't biased against Harry, just always felt his limitations got in the way of what could have been a ground breaking season, a season in which we had our strongest side since the premier league began. i've also maintained that a rebuilding job awaited whoever was in charge: be it harry, avb or jose.
I think one point no-one can argue is that tactics should run through not only a team, but also a squad. An injury to a winger ie Lennon, should never have equated to a seismic shift in tactics, attacking focal points, and should alos never have lead to VdV or Modric being shunted to the wing. It was a really bad failing, that one injury to the first 11 resulted in a completly disjointed side and a complete shift of focus from our strengths last season.
To be a pacy fast incisive side one week, then a lumbering, slow build one the next was never acceptable and completly disruptive. I think everyone who talks of AVB's tactical strength is hoping that a tactical philosophy that runs through the squad will be implemented. Thats my hope anyway.
I remember debating with Moonlight about aspirations for the coming season. He and sheikh were maintaining that anything below fourth would be a failure. I said i'd have to wait until the end of the transfer window. Its now apparent we are weaker than we were last season. Hence i wont be judging AVB on the same criteria that i was judging Redknapp last year. I believe AVB has more tactical nouse, and believe he'll be successful long term, but short term, looking at the personel, we are miles away. Scarily the first 11 this looks a couple of injuries away from mid table standard.
I wasn't biased against Harry, just always felt his limitations got in the way of what could have been a ground breaking season, a season in which we had our strongest side since the premier league began. i've also maintained that a rebuilding job awaited whoever was in charge: be it harry, avb or jose.
I think one point no-one can argue is that tactics should run through not only a team, but also a squad. An injury to a winger ie Lennon, should never have equated to a seismic shift in tactics, attacking focal points, and should alos never have lead to VdV or Modric being shunted to the wing. It was a really bad failing, that one injury to the first 11 resulted in a completly disjointed side and a complete shift of focus from our strengths last season.
To be a pacy fast incisive side one week, then a lumbering, slow build one the next was never acceptable and completly disruptive. I think everyone who talks of AVB's tactical strength is hoping that a tactical philosophy that runs through the squad will be implemented. Thats my hope anyway.
I remember debating with Moonlight about aspirations for the coming season. He and sheikh were maintaining that anything below fourth would be a failure. I said i'd have to wait until the end of the transfer window. Its now apparent we are weaker than we were last season. Hence i wont be judging AVB on the same criteria that i was judging Redknapp last year. I believe AVB has more tactical nouse, and believe he'll be successful long term, but short term, looking at the personel, we are miles away. Scarily the first 11 this looks a couple of injuries away from mid table standard.
I wasn't biased against Harry, just always felt his limitations got in the way of what could have been a ground breaking season, a season in which we had our strongest side since the premier league began. i've also maintained that a rebuilding job awaited whoever was in charge: be it harry, avb or jose.
I think one point no-one can argue is that tactics should run through not only a team, but also a squad. An injury to a winger ie Lennon, should never have equated to a seismic shift in tactics, attacking focal points, and should alos never have lead to VdV or Modric being shunted to the wing. It was a really bad failing, that one injury to the first 11 resulted in a completly disjointed side and a complete shift of focus from our strengths last season.
To be a pacy fast incisive side one week, then a lumbering, slow build one the next was never acceptable and completly disruptive. I think everyone who talks of AVB's tactical strength is hoping that a tactical philosophy that runs through the squad will be implemented. Thats my hope anyway.
I remember debating with Moonlight about aspirations for the coming season. He and sheikh were maintaining that anything below fourth would be a failure. I said i'd have to wait until the end of the transfer window. Its now apparent we are weaker than we were last season. Hence i wont be judging AVB on the same criteria that i was judging Redknapp last year. I believe AVB has more tactical nouse, and believe he'll be successful long term, but short term, looking at the personel, we are miles away. Scarily the first 11 this looks a couple of injuries away from mid table standard.