I'd be delighted for you to tell me. I remember the game well.
Maybe I missed something.
Hurzler himself stated that the biggest difference was the level of application in his initial plan. Estupian 'could' be considered a 'tactical' change. I'd consider it replacing an inferior player with a better one.
I remember being absolutely shocked at how suddenly, in the very same patterns the game had shown first-half, we were so flat.
Tell mew this; do you remember us playing ewith the same zip, urgency and (most importantly) desire we showed in the first-half?
This discussion has been all over this forum as you know. I assume you believe that he is out of his depth. I also assume that you do not like the high-line + high inverted FBs. I also assume you do not like the reliance we have on speed/pace in defensive transitions to make up for the areas we principly get caught (in behind where the FBs have vacated and the midfield has not adequetely covere or is imbalanced due to two no natural or double pivot structure. All good. I get it. I personally was relieved when he stopped sending the FBs so high all the time in early March, and I did wish he'd been more pragmatic in Jan/Feb when the injuries were frankly immense. I saw plenty of times this season (like last) where the football was wonderful, great moves executed, and great goals scored. I equally saw some of the worst errors/ratio of individual mistakes, I've ever seen in a season. Ultimately though, I think it's impossible to accurately evaluate due to the circumtances around him/injuries, which robbed us of any pattern of consistency even in the ability to rotate.
Me?
I'd like us to be a 4-2-3-1 or a 3-5-2.
I think 4-3-3 requires very elite players and/or players confidently bedded into that system.
I am not sure 'shown up' is the phrase. Such suggestions make me wonder if people genuinely believe that the entire club would've let a naive manager who is being shown up remain in his job if that were the case?
That won't work.
You have the same fears that many here have. I don't have them to anything like that degree, partially because I believe some things will have changed as a consequence of this season.
As I have also said, I (sadly) feel this is all wasted 'fret' and 'fro' because I believe they are waiting for the emotional clouds to part before they announce his sacking (in a very nice way)...
Ok so from memory. Going forward Wellbeck and their other forward dropped deeper Inbetween bentancur and our back line meaning they could out number him and compress our back line moving Porro when he wasn’t out of position already because of Ange’s favoured inverted fullback tactics infield. They also built from the right and switched quickly to the left Meaning that Mitoma was able to totally dominate. He had a good first half anyway but in the second half he had so much time and space it was criminal negligence