inkpenspur
Allan Nielsen
I think there is a little jumping to a conclusion with regards to QRP. The reference is NOT QPR but QRP. Also I don't think Haringey council would have any interest in what goes on in the Boro of Hammersmith and Fulham?
Any one can explain what is so intersting about NFL link ?
Not sure. My understanding is that at this stage these are just the draft proposals for the planning application concerning increase capacity etc that are to be considered by the Development Management Forum and Quality Review Panel on 15 July. And that if approved by the DM and QRP then the planning application proper can be submitted.
They'll rent the stadium from us for 8 games a year, in exchange for us building bigger changing rooms and having a roll-out plastic pitch. Could be worth £10-20m a season over the course of the deal
Really?You can hire any of Twickenham, Wembley, the Millennium, and probably the Olympic Stadium once finished for less than £500k per event.
In the case of the NFL, its more likely to be a split of International Series type games between our new Stadium and Wembley or another. Talk of 8 games or permanent franchise is still years away from happening, but might be accelerated if the venue was established. In the meantime, the cost of a grass pitch rolling into a greenhouse and larger changing spaces will be justified by the flexibility to host all kinds of events.
Pure rental of the stadium for 8 games wouldn't get anything close to £10m. You can hire any of Twickenham, Wembley, the Millennium, and probably the Olympic Stadium once finished for less than £500k per event. The main revenue masked water tyrants for all major sports teams/organisations are Broadcast, Sponsorship and Hospitality (in that order). The NFL would be keeping the first two and a cut of the third.
Wembley costs around £900k per opening!!! Just to have staff on stand by for maintenance costs around £130k alone per event
I should add that one out clients is CBRE Norland who look after Wembley and twickenham so takes where my numbers come from
78.000Planning app for increased capacity NOW OFFICIAL!
That needs to go into thread title.
Bedford has told us where he gets his numbers from T-C.... Where are you getting yours from?As an overhead divided by an average number of games the £900k might work, but wouldn't extend as an incremental cost for each opening above that average. £130k standby for maintenance is way off.
Aside from the above, the full cost of opening is not generally passed on to event promotors. Each of those stadiums has a different business model to ensure a profit is still made.
As an overhead divided by an average number of games the £900k might work, but wouldn't extend as an incremental cost for each opening above that average. £130k standby for maintenance is way off.
Aside from the above, the full cost of opening is not generally passed on to event promotors. Each of those stadiums has a different business model to ensure a profit is still made.
61,000 has a nice ring to it.I don't know if this means anything (as it's a site largely populated by people inside the architecture and engineering industries), but the stadium thread on SSC has been renamed LONDON - New White Hart Lane (61,000), instead of (56,250)
H'mm, take a look at this from the local rag dated 17/02/2015 :I don't know if this means anything (as it's a site largely populated by people inside the architecture and engineering industries), but the stadium thread on SSC has been renamed LONDON - New White Hart Lane (61,000), instead of (56,250)
It's just a punt from one of the mods mate.... I guess based on a mixture of a few bits of ITK and a capacity increase being mentioned in the pre-planning doc).I don't know if this means anything (as it's a site largely populated by people inside the architecture and engineering industries), but the stadium thread on SSC has been renamed LONDON - New White Hart Lane (61,000), instead of (56,250)