with the level of complaints in this thread since the Emirates Marketing Project game that there are posters who having been waiting for one poor result so they can lay in to Sherwood, i guess i was looking for something more concrete than what you have provided. i thought that much was obvious.
even looking beyond the game on Wednesday all i have seen thus far is people raising concerns about a manager who has no experience at this level and whether he is the right man for the job longer term. as there is no data, in the term of past experience, to mull over i think it's entirely understandable that some have concerns - a few games between now and the end of the season will not change the fact there is little information to draw on and if some people consider past experience as an important indicator as to whether he's likely to be the right man for the job then, again, i find it entirely reasonable that some choose to hold that as a negative. what i don't agree with, however, is using his lack of experience as proof that he isn't good enough - understandable as it is to be skeptical - someone who is a blank canvas should be judged on what he does, not what he hasn't done, imv
