I think that you made your mind up before we had kicked a ball under him and are unlikely to change your mind whatever happens.
Yeah I agree yesterday wasn't the best, in fact it was awful. To be fair we've been poor at the start of games under Sherwood in general and it's something that needs addressing quickly. We've managed to eventually get going in games against the likes of Swansea and Palace but it's too late if it takes you 40 minutes to get your act together against Emirates Marketing Project.
The changes we were going through were massive. It couldn't happen all at once, so it seemed we started from the back. High line - tick. High possession - tick. Quick transition between midfield and attack - never quite got there (due to a combination IMO of Rose's injury and the two Eriks not being ready to bring in ahead of Townsend and Lennon).
We've got no leadership.
AVB assembled a team who were tough, but would be submissive to his will.
And then we went and decapitated ourselves.
Were people calling him childish names like 'saggy faced ****' and belittling his background? There's a difference between people never warming to him or being unconvinced by him and character assassination.
I don't think people see the irony when they question Levy's decision to appoint a manager with no experience but were completely fine with AVB who flopped in his only previous job in this country and has only managed for about 3 years in total.
Were people calling him childish names like 'saggy faced ****' and belittling his background? There's a difference between people never warming to him or being unconvinced by him and character assassination.
I don't think people see the irony when they question Levy's decision to appoint a manager with no experience but were completely fine with AVB who flopped in his only previous job in this country and has only managed for about 3 years in total.
Thanks. I know what he is TRYING to do, but it was a poor comparison and badly made. As you say, nothing in my questioning of AVB has been personal, vitriolic or non-football related - unlike the quite pathetic anti-Sherwoodism there has been on here by some.
My questioning of the style of play AVB was delivering were QUESTIONS I raised AFTER three months of seeing it. Furthermore, he had a full pre-season and the opportunity of bringing in at least some of his own players. Raising questions and giving reasons for those questions, on a Spurs forum is entirely valid and based on my opinions of the FOOTBALL he was serving up, nothing more, nothing less. It certainly wasnt informed by some pre-judged prejudice that he and others have shown on here toward Sherwood.
I am grateful to you, DTA, for acknowledging that and it's a shame others can't also wait to give an assessment based on football alone. When I asked Scarra how long one should give TS before judging him, he replied at least to the end of the season and more realistically next season, AFTER he has had a pre-season of his own and brought in some of his own players. I agree that is the time to judge. Legitimate questions of style, selection, tactics etc are fine in the meantime, but, please make them from a rational, not predetermined viewpoint, coloured by prejudice on how he looks, what he speaks like etc etc.
Give him time before rushing to judgement AFTER he has had time to prove himself - one way or the other. Is that too much to ask?
have to say that after reading some of the posts in this thread my faith in this place is startting to return/get restored a little bit what with the people that are strongly defending Sherwood and not behaving like some reputation craving chameleon
I'll name names, Craig_J, Jurgen_the_germab (as always), Kingdawson.... please take a bow.
it actually feels good to see a balance of opinions on here from either side about the topic of our manager...
That IS what the vast majority of posters that aren't exclusively pro-Sherwood are doing. What I have a problem with is everyone being lumped into one group, let's call it 'the anti-Sherwood phalanx', assigned the opinions of the very few posters that are truly negative and biased towards Sherwood and being told to 'just support the manager' or 'don't rush to judgements'.
Most importantly: It doesn't address any of the points being raised. Every game is another 90 minutes of football to discuss. I'm neither pro or anti, but there are issues with what he's doing that are questionable and I will raise those points when I see them/think of them. That doesn't mean I'm aiming vitriol at him or wanting him sacked.
That IS what the vast majority of posters that aren't exclusively pro-Sherwood are doing. What I have a problem with is everyone being lumped into one group, let's call it 'the anti-Sherwood phalanx', assigned the opinions of the very few posters that are truly negative and biased towards Sherwood and being told to 'just support the manager' or 'don't rush to judgements'.
Most importantly: It doesn't address any of the points being raised. Every game is another 90 minutes of football to discuss. I'm neither pro or anti, but there are issues with what he's doing that are questionable and I will raise those points when I see them/think of them. That doesn't mean I'm aiming vitriol at him or wanting him sacked.
Parting shot from Capoue here: “I am not surprised. It is the English way. They don't know much about foreign players.”
Racist Timmeh?
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2892...ttenham-exit-after-sherwood-rant?ICID=HP_BN_2
Parting shot from Capoue here: “I am not surprised. It is the English way. They don't know much about foreign players.”
Racist Timmeh?
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2892...ttenham-exit-after-sherwood-rant?ICID=HP_BN_2