I don't fully agree with what. I can see why it appears that way as under AVB, the match could be going at quite a slow tempo, people probably looking around at each other thinking 'well this is ****' only for proper chances to then come in a burst, followed by a slow period again. But ultimately, I think the idea that we created a poor amount of real good chances under AVB got exagerrated.
Against WBA at home a few weeks ago for example, people were happier with the performance compared to some of AVB's games even though it really was the same kind of dog**** we produced against Hull, just at a quicker tempo. Tempo gets equated to playing well even though against WBA we barely created anything decent.
Against Palace, the less said about that game the better, but it's hardly like we created raft upon raft of chances. Although I did see in the Palace came a much more controlled performance in the second half once we had gotten the lead, which I was quite impressed with. It showed the team had been practising something during the week as the set up was obvious. We were good and patient with the ball, and Palace had shot their load.
