I do think it was more difficult for AVB and he failed.
Rodgers succeeded when it was easier, then went on to succeed when it was much - much harder this season. But it wasn't as easy last season as you make it out to be. And worth noting that as "low pressure" "bare minimum" "just maintain the status quo" as that job was he took over where Benitez, Hodgson and Dalglish had failed to keep them happy. His job wasn't just to keep them where they were, but to make them stronger long term - relatively quickly.
We will never know how it would have been had the roles been reversed, but whatever the situations Rodgers succeeded and AVB failed. When it was certainly possible for the outcome to have been different.
I think you're purposely missing the point tbh.
underestimating the amount of time new signings need to adjust to this league is one thing but how exactly can your opinion go from:
being happy that the board supporting AVB with the new signings to claiming he wasn't supported in being allowed to bring the players he wants in. I mean wtf? you only recently still mention Moutinho as evidence he "wasn't supported" but totally neglect to bring up the 7 new signings that you previously claimed was evidence the board supported the manager in the transfer market.
id imagine that would be because what we have learned since the summer would contradict what he initially thought at the time
Since it became clear AVB wanted the summer transfer window to go differently? It's turned out to be classic Levy, using the investment in players to claim the manager was supported when actually supporting them and truly backing them comes down to more than that. AVB got some of the players he wanted no doubt, but it's became clear he wanted things to go down differently than they did.
You precious ex manager is to blame then as he openly championed Baldini for the DOF role both in public and in private. Maybe in future he should learn to keep his mouth shut.
Oh no oh no oh no....you're going the "who actually signed the players" route now? this just smacks of desperation now:lol:
funny that someone who likes to knock Levy for his failures to back Redknapp in the market is now struggling to get on board with the idea it was a similar circumstance for his replacement :-"
*beep* *beep* *beep* *beep*
Is it a bird? Is it a plane? NO, it's the sound of the NWND lorry reversing rapidly out of its "I was glad AVB was sacked" parking position.
Have I had a ridiculous change of heart re: AVB's qualities? Certainly not.
What I do believe, however, was that for all his faults, AVB had class. He respected the massive and traditional community institution he had been placed in charge of.
Even after his sacking, and his supposed fall-out with Levy & Baldini, he could have stuck the knife into the club. He didn't and bar one or two comments, he has respected the club and its decision to part with him.
I honestly couldn't fault AVB speaking to the media and defending his decisions and the club.
I don't think he was good enough or rather experienced enough for the job, but he was a credit to the club whilst in charge.
If sacking AVB means we have to put up with this poisonous, self-important, manipulative t**t dragging the club and his decisions through the dirt in public, then please come back Andre.
This Sandro business is embarrassing. I personally think Sandro is highly overrated by Spurs fans, but whatever his opinions, this classless self-serving media campaign is completely against what being a manager of a top, historic club is all about. If you're managing a minnow team like Stoke punching above their weight creating a siege mentality against the big boys then fine.
Gobbing off in every press conference possible to serve your own agenda is not acceptable. Please get rid of this clown as soon as possible.
Buck stops with Levy. He gets all the praise in the world from me when things are going well and he gets the brunt of the criticism when things don't go well. He's the man in charge and that's the bed he lies in. He's made bad decision after bad decision when it comes to footballing matters at this club and the whole AVB saga was the final straw. He was a bad hire, because he didn't fit with what Levy wanted. He didn't do his due diligence properly and because of that we've wasted a year and allowed Liverpool to overtake us.
You can make arguments to say AVB could have done something differently, or Baldini, or Dawson, or Nabil Bentaleb if you wanted. Everyone has played a part in why this season has been awful. But it all traces back to one man. And if it was the first time one of his punts had gone wrong, I'd be more inclined to forgive. This isn't the first decision he got badly wrong though, and I'm fed up with it.
But you're missing the point again?
He backed AVB by doing the number 1 thing AVB claimed he wanted...bring in a DOF. he then allowed AVB to choose what DOF he wanted. How exactly can he then be blamed about signings when it was our manager that continuously went on about Baldini:lol:
hahahaha oh man. So let me get this straight...
AVB finishes 5th and claims we need to bring in a DOF system....the chairman obliges. AVB then claims Baldini would be his preferred choice...the chairman obliges. The chairman then allows his DOF to do his job which is to recruit players to the cost of 100m plus...the chairman obliges. AVB then has some sort of issue with the DOF that he wanted and....it's the chairmans fault that AVB didn't get the players he wants?
GIVE
ME
A
BREAK
But you're missing the point again?
He backed AVB by doing the number 1 thing AVB claimed he wanted...bring in a DOF. he then allowed AVB to choose what DOF he wanted. How exactly can he then be blamed about signings when it was our manager that continuously went on about Baldini:lol:
I would guess because maybe it wasn't just Baldini operating on his own to bring in players either, or even Baldini and AVB working together to build the footballing side while Levy concentrated on the stadium and commercial deals for example. It seems like a lot of the signings were Levy style signings and that he had an influence in them too...to the detriment of what the head coach wanted.
The thing is this kind of leadership means we might well do well again next season or the one after. Because those Levy style young guys will be a year more mature and a year more settled. They'll get really good to the point where we may sneak a 4th and then just as looks like we can push on for the title, Eriksen will be sold having had a world class season and we'll go again. We are always stumbling into any success by hoping everything fits together eventually, rather than by going to some sort of plan and building. And while it may work to an extent because these young players will have potential and therefore a 'safety net' for improving, I'm not sure the club is going to get to where it wants to be by running itself this way. And that's why I blame Levy. We've seen the cycle repeat too many times now.
you're in full on desperation mode now imho. A lot of those signings were "Levy style signings"?
You're in cloud cuckoo land if you genuinely think Levy brought in Baldini and then suddenly took it upon himself to scout a random romanian cb, or a random winger from Belgium and decide himself those are the players needed.
does AVB wanting a DoF, Baldini even, mean that he automatically signed up to agree with every decision which was made from that point onward?
aren't you quite critical of the way Baldini went about his business in the summer? "can't wait for this bozo to leave" i believe is what you said in the recent Baldini thread (or maybe it was Jabroni...) one would assume then that you are open to the possibility that Baldini failed the manager in terms of targets acquired?
come on KD let's not spoil an otherwise decent debate with such an abrasive tone
i apologise but BOL does not think at all rationally when it has anything to do with AVB.