More baseless (and false accusations).Nowadays the term has been debased to include anybody vaguely interested in the environment, gender politics or gay rights.
Which government passed the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013?
More baseless (and false accusations).Nowadays the term has been debased to include anybody vaguely interested in the environment, gender politics or gay rights.
More baseless (and false accusations).
Which government passed the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013?
What a patriot.
We've been through this, as have the world's economists. If you increase the personal tax burden too high, you decrease the revenue. It might take a bit more nuance and understanding than the average lefty policy, but it's what happens in the real world.The Tories go on and on about the country living beyond it's means and then create a revenue problem by giving their mates in the corporate world, a 65 billion pound tax cut, then argue oh, oh we have a revenue problem, we need to cut the NHS further, what's this, oh we can't afford social care anymore that has to be cut too. Schools, the oinks don't need funding for their kid's education, let's cut spending there too. And on it goes.
That has nothing to do with Corbyn's ability nor (proper) Conservative policies. It has everything to do with May putting out a terrible manifesto and being a shoddy party leader.What is the Tory rebuttal, the same tired old lines from the fascist Murdoch press, 'the free money tree, a coalition of chaos' etc., just playing patronizing games applying the same old appeals to fears. No wonder things are slipping away from them. They look what they are, a sad bunch of lazy twits who believe that they are born to rule and that any hard lifting would be done by The Sun. May looks and sounds like a ragged public school teacher who has been given a particularly hard time by the lower 5th. What an embarrassment. Wasn't it mean to be Corbyn who was meant to look bad in comparison? What happened to that?
Earlier on in this thread I said that the Tories should underestimate Corbyn at their peril. It seems that my judgement might be shown to be correct. I still believe the forces of darkness will win, but boy they will have been given a mighty scare and that might get them to moderate their more extremist policies a little. This will a great thing for everybody in the long run IMHO.
Yet they're people who vote Conservative and voted for the party making it law. So your accusations are baseless.Wrong end of the stick mate. I agree, I don't consider this to constitute 'leftist' policy at all, although many do.
Policies aside, i do not want a terrorist sympathiser & a dopey Diane Abbott running our country. GHod help us!
I thought your lot hated patriotism as it is knuckle headed right wing aggressive.
Yet they're people who vote Conservative and voted for the party making it law. So your accusations are baseless.
Well I am being a bit sarcastic, but with a serious edge. When things get tough for workers, the elite always call for sacrifice in the name of the nation, but when things get even a tiny bit challenging for them, it's rightio then I'm off. The same goes when the bullets start flying too. Just check out the service records of Bush Jnr and Dumpf.
Arsenal fan as well.
We had some travellers turn up at a local school and break into the playing fields. Disgusting and Corbyn despite being quite good in a lot of ways, wants to protect these low life benefit cheating scum. I cant vote for that. I really do not think I will vote unless the English democrats are back on the ballot.
We are not in America so I have no intention of checking out Bush juniors war record(though I seem to remember he was a tinklehead). I think if you approve of mass immigration and I am very close with some Latvians who I consider close friends and great guys. If you approve of mass immigration and all the immigrants I met only came here to make more money and improve their lives(nothing wrong on their part) then you have to appreciate people will do the same the other way.
I fear the will be a brain drain if Corbyn gets in, and as money has always trickled down I wonder what will happen when the is no water.
Really? That is about a twentieth order policy concern. That would be like me saying I will vote Tory because their recreational fishing policy is better, which it is.
I cant be racist some of my best friends are black...Yet they're people who vote Conservative and voted for the party making it law. So your accusations are baseless.
We've been through this, as have the world's economists. If you increase the personal tax burden too high, you decrease the revenue. It might take a bit more nuance and understanding than the average lefty policy, but it's what happens in the real world.
Businesses that have tax savings (on the whole) reinvest those savings, leading to growth, leading to employment. If you punish business, you decrease employment. That increases the need for benefits, which creates the need for a bigger magic money tree. So you go through the same cycle again and again until the country is bankrupt like it very nearly was in the 70s.
That has nothing to do with Corbyn's ability nor (proper) Conservative policies. It has everything to do with May putting out a terrible manifesto and being a shoddy party leader.
Of course there's no guarantee that they will all invest all of it - I was quite clear that that's not the case.They are not guaranteed to reinvest those tax savings here though are they? They could very easily reinvest it off shore, you know in one of those nice low rent, low wage, no environmental law dictatorships, where profits are easier to come by... So really your whole economic argument is predicated on the naïve notion that these grasping transnationals will 'do the right thing by Britain.' It's more of a hope than a reality then isn't it? I'll bet you still believe in the fairies at the bottom of the garden too.
I also agree that they are not left/right issues.I cant be racist some of my best friends are black...
In all seriousness I agree with Gilzeantoscore that these are not left / right issues (as I said to dainish... a few months ago when discussing Libs not being a left party).
Not a criticism of those on here but it does appear that this is a new Tool in the Alt right arguments - cant believe you are bullying trump / me / racists you are supposed to be liberal.
Of course there's no guarantee that they will all invest all of it - I was quite clear that that's not the case.
But most will invest it, and most will invest in the UK - that's been shown time and time again with low corporation tax. The alternative is to increase tax and run the risk of the entire business being places overseas and the tax revenue being zero. Same as with personal tax.
R-U-S-X was agreeing with me Scara. You misinterpreted what I said. I wasn't saying that conservatives were making that claim. I was saying that some people defined themselves as being on the left in those circumstances. This is something that I disagree with. They are no more of the left than you or Danish are. I say that knowing that you both support anti prejudicial causes.I also agree that they are not left/right issues.
I was answering his accusation that those who vote Conservative see it as a left issue, which is clearly not the case.