Disagree. This is on him. There are certain questions that now have to be asked.I wouldn’t be too hard on Ange today. But what today illustrated is the value of a solid defence. Allows you to play another way and wins you games.
Starting to look like he does not have the answers or willing to look at the issuesA lot of questions for Ange to answer with his system.
He doesn't. Hopefully it's a "yet". He needs to learn how to break teams down in the EPL.Ange hasn’t got a fudging clue how to change it.
This is brick.
Coventry will probably knock us out anyway so maybe some of the fringe players can impress. But looking out our next few games, we’re not coming-out of the bottom half of the table any time soon with this nonsenseNever looked like scoring, or causing much trouble.
I hope we give Bergvall, Spence, Moore a change some of the 1st team Vs Coventry to try and claim a place in the first team.
Some players today have had plenty of chances and not delivering
We have not created anything of noteI wouldn’t be too hard on Ange today. But what today illustrated is the value of a solid defence. Allows you to play another way and wins you games.
I disagree mate. Arsenal were without big players today but we barely laid a glove on them. Have to ask questions of the manager and his tactics sadly.I wouldn’t be too hard on Ange today. But what today illustrated is the value of a solid defence. Allows you to play another way and wins you games.
And this game sums up how far behind Arsenal we really are. What were they missing 7 players? 3 who would have been in the starting 11 and 4 who would have been on the bench, and who do we bring on to chase the game Werner and Odebert. Its about time big Ange gets some scrutiny. I know I sound like a broken record but every performance has been like this for ages going well back into last season
Tbh I'm not basing it on just this season, I'm basing on Ange's entire time here and what I see as holes in the system. These are things that I felt we should have addressed in the summer. I'm not even trying to be negative and I don't think I am honestly but I'm just analysing the football as I'm seeing it.I don't disagree with that but your post that I responded to was using a couple of games 'evidence' to argue the point, which is obviously not enough to go on
Their two most important players. We were missing one who is highly inconsistent.They were missing 2 starting players. We were missing 1
Their two most important players. We were missing one who is highly inconsistent.
Over simplfying it, that's only one part. A lot of our play went through the middle, trying intricate passing that didn't come off.Ball out wide to the wingers to cut it back into the striker.
When there are 5 defenders to your 1 striker, it's difficult to find that cut back. And that's if you can get your wingers in behind them
Imagine if Rice and Odegaard were playing. This would have been 3-4 nilTheir two most important players. We were missing one who is highly inconsistent.
We don't create clear cut chances for anyone. I said this last season and this one but was told it due to lacking a CF. We have the CF yet shockingly we still don't actually creat chances for the striker.
Those are the kinds of players we’re in the market for.We were never going to score with that set up. Kulu, Johnson and Werner are nowhere near good enough.
SonWhere are the runners to support Solanke?
Maddison, Kulusevski, Udogie or Porro.....