Superb. A gold in gymnastics is pretty unreal.Athletes from little Northern Ireland, who are representing either Ireland or Team GB, have now won 4 Golds! Amazing!
Daniel Whiffen: swimming 800m freestyle for Ireland.
Jack McMillan: swimming Men's 4x200m relay for Team GB.
Hannah Scott: women's quadruple sculls for Team GB.
Rhys McClenaghan: Men's Pommel Horse for Ireland.
Whiffen has another swim in the 1500m final, plus the 10k.
Prior to Paris, Northern Ireland Athletes had only won 3 Golds ever! Mary Peters in the 1972 pentathlon and two from the Team GB hockey in 1988.
You have every right not to give a fudge. You come off as offended yourself.The conversation was obviously about biology and not identity politics. You're typical of the woke phalanx, trying to find offense in everything.
To paraphrase that great philosopher Ricky Gervais, you've the right to tell me that you find something distasteful (offended) and I've the right not to give a fudge.
What I have said is that people who are intersex don't always fit neatly into the sex binary. This is imo clearly scientifically true.Every person with DSD is either male or female. Pretending that there is a third sex, or that sex is a spectrum, is an ideological stance, not a scientific one.
People can identify as they wish, but in some contexts sex matters. Combat sport is one of those contexts. Safety and fairness are more important than hurt feelings.
So you would say to her face that she's a man, you would talk about her as a man with her being present.I am not being mean spirited, I am commenting on the safety of women in boxing. I would say the same things as I say here to Khelif in the highly unlikely event that I meet Khelif. The failed test was not a testosterone test, it was a chromosone test.
Here's some more info on DSD and sports -
https://sex-matters.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Womens-sport-and-DSDs.pdf
Colin Wright is a biologist. There is no reputable peer-reviewed science supporting the claim that sex is other than binary. There are two types of gametes, large and small.
Science is not a left v right issue. The fact that women's sport needs protecting tells us what we need to now. The attempts by men to enter women's sports have nothing to do science and everything to do with a reactionary and anti-scientific ideology which threatens the progress made by women and LGB people in the last century.
This has nothing to do with men attempting to enter women's sport.
Also science is very much used politically. Scientists can be consciously or unconsciously biased or their work used for left or right perspectives. Smoking, homosexuality, climate change all spring out as quick and obvious examples where 'science' was used to support certain points of view.
What part of IF she has an XY chromosomes then biologically she is a man do you not get?You have every right not to give a fudge. You come off as offended yourself.
If not calling a woman a man is too much to ask from you because you don't give a fudge, fine, that is as you say your right.
What part of IF she has an XY chromosomes then biologically she is a man do you not get?
If you find science distasteful that's your problem.
When speaking about her I have used her preferred pronouns. I couldn't care less if people identify as a male, female, or whatever, it has no impact on me. Again you're just looking to find offence whereeever you can and it's boring.
Yes, in very rare cases of DSD that is possible. And if she has XY chromosome she is genotypic male and that is separate from the phenotypic sex as I stated previously. Again, that's why there should be protocols in place to determine if she should be allowed to compete in order to make sure the sport is safe and also it would've stopped the attention, quite possibly unfairly, she is getting.Apparently she has a uterus, ovaries and a vagina. The ability to produce eggs would make her a female whether she is XX or XY. That would be science.
Spot on.This shouldn’t be conflated with trans participation in sport. But like trans people, she has an unfair advantage and shouldn’t be allowed to compete against other women IMO. This is a prime example of why we need another category such as an ‘open category’ where anyone (trans, DSD) can compete. Yes the field might not be very big at the moment but it will most likely grow in the future and it solves the issue of excluding them from competing. Its not perfect and some won’t think it’s fair but it’s a hell of a lot fairer and safer than allowing people like her to compete against women, especially in a violent sport like boxing.
Yes, in very rare cases of DSD that is possible. And if she has XY chromosome she is genotypic male and that is separate from the phenotypic sex as I stated previously. Again, that's why there should be protocols in place to determine if she should be allowed to compete in order to make sure the sport is safe and also it would've stopped the attention, quite possibly unfairly, she is getting.
Yup, and again it's why there should be proper protocols in place. It's bad enough happening in athletics, the stakes are higher in any of the combat sports where serious physical damage can be done.Melissa Bishop finished 4th in the women 800m final in Rio 2016. Gold, silver and bronze ALL had high testosterone levels and therefore had an advantage including Caster Semenya. Imagine how gutted Bishop must have felt at the time finishing below not one but three athletes under those circumstances and missing out on a medal.
Yup, and again it's why there should be proper protocols in place. It's bad enough happening in athletics, the stakes are higher in any of the combat sports where serious physical damage can be done.
If being a bellend is on the proscribed list then he's got no chance.So, when does Noah Lyles get caught for doping?
That's the only question after the 100m.
If being a bellend is on the proscribed list then he's got no chance.