What was the real reason JN was sacked? Has it come out?
General noise is
- Kahn & co wanted Tuchel
- He wasn't the right cultural fit for them
- Neuer and Muller power
What was the real reason JN was sacked? Has it come out?
Alan Brazil who is very close to Poch has revealed on talksport today that the great man has been left very disappointed that Spurs have made no approach for him.
If we dont get Nagelsmann and appoint a suitable dof, providing them with the freedom and tools they will need, I fear all hell is going to break loose, particularly if Poch excels at the chavs.
I'm not legal expert, much less on German employment law. But I do think the public picture and the contractual details are probably quite different. I'm pretty sure a club like Bayern wouldn't write contracts that would expose them to the extent you outlined, nor would they have "fired" him in such a way that would again leave them exposed. I'm pretty sure there's a clause in there somewhere saying something to the extent of "we can fire you for any reason" and "we will stop paying you once you are hired by another club." The only thing I could see as being an issue is if the new club is paying him less than what he was earning at Bayern and Bayern was forced to cover the difference. But that can be resolved by Bayern charging that amount as a "transfer fee" from the new club and then giving it to JN. So for the new club it wouldn't make sense to offer a lower salary, since they would be paying the full amount anyway.It's a little more complicated, Nagelsmann could argue
- There is no (defendable?) reason for his dismissal in the first place, so he would absolutely be owed his contract value
- Publicly he's been painted as fired, his role is absolutely diminished (to nothing), effectively they are doing everything but stopping paying him
- Him being out of "doing" could be seen as long term damaging to his career if he just sat it out
You can argue that "humiliation", cutting of job duties and damaging long term prospects, compounded by if they expecting his next employer to cover their contract puts them a bad legal position. And take it from me, German worker laws are very different from US/UK.
Nagelsmann could argue he's owed his full contract value and still be able to get income from his next employer.
the great man has been left very disappointed that Spurs have made no approach for him.
Alan Brazil who is very close to Poch has revealed on talksport today that the great man has been left very disappointed that Spurs have made no approach for him.
If we dont get Nagelsmann and appoint a suitable dof, providing them with the freedom and tools they will need, I fear all hell is going to break loose, particularly if Poch excels at the chavs.
Alan Brazil who is very close to Poch has revealed on talksport today that the great man has been left very disappointed that Spurs have made no approach for him.
If we dont get Nagelsmann and appoint a suitable dof, providing them with the freedom and tools they will need, I fear all hell is going to break loose, particularly if Poch excels at the chavs.
What was the real reason JN was sacked? Has it come out?
I would've thought that a club putting a manager on gardening leave for the remainder of their contract would count as constructive dismissal. Irrespective of that though, I don't think it would be a pain to employ Nagelsmann. His Spurs salary is likely to be similar (maybe even higher) than his salary at Bayern, so the only real question is whether Nagelsmann would rather earn a salary to do nothing for a while or wants to get back in the game quickly.If your employer treated you like brick, "fired" you when you had lost 3 games all season and were in with a shot of treble, and per contract "owed" you £30M. Refused to actually fire you but punted you out on gardening leave with the explicit intention of fudging your next employer, I'm not sure how open anyone would be to a mutual agreement.
I suspect if we want Nagelsmann it will be a bit of a pain in the ass
I would've thought that a club putting a manager on gardening leave for the remainder of their contract would count as constructive dismissal. Irrespective of that though, I don't think it would be a pain to employ Nagelsmann. His Spurs salary is likely to be similar (maybe even higher) than his salary at Bayern, so the only real question is whether Nagelsmann would rather earn a salary to do nothing for a while or wants to get back in the game quickly.
I really, really hope its Nagelsmann. Apart from looking like a good young manager he also rides a Harley so he obviously has taste.
Same reasons as Conte mainly:
According to BILD reporter Christian Falk, Nagelsmann didn’t have the support of the players anymore and many of his tactical decisions were being questioned. For a coach who lives and dies by his tactical innovation and fluidity, this essentially made the situation unsalvageable. Raphael Honigstein of The Athletic wrote that the players had complained that Nagelsmann was “overcomplicating things in training, making too many changes during games and not communicating enough with them”.
https://breakingthelines.com/tactic...wrong-for-julian-nagelsmann-at-bayern-munich/
I hope it is Nagelsmann but I don't understand why he would accept. The job usually does nothing for your reputation. It might be even harder too if Kane is not here next season.
That will do wonders for his reputation. Suspect he already has enough money for that already.Enough money to fund the hookers and blow ...
It could well just be a legacy from his time at Bayern? Maybe had very little control or less say than he was promised, so he's just voicing that he can't tolerate that kind of situation again.The "full control" bit is probably a Twitter exageration. Perhaps he asked for a veto or something like that
It could well just be a legacy from his time at Bayern? Maybe had very little control or less say than he was promised, so he's just voicing that he can't tolerate that kind of situation again.
I doubt he wants 'full' control and besides, he'll likely find most jobs come with a DofF.
It does hint at why he turned down of Chelsea... wouldn't surprise me if he whiffed the Boehly way of working and thought fudge that.