theres hope then. maybe he can add to his 3 england caps and become the player England have been missing?
Yes there is hope. He would certainly have gotten more caps in the last year had he been fit. Henderson ffs. If he will become the player "England have been missing" I don't know as in my opinion England already have the player they have been missing in Carrick, but have chosen to not use him cause someone who runs around a lot are preferred. Like I said already, Huddlestone does have limitiations, so it's all about what system is used, in a Hodgson 4-4-2 I don't think Huddlestone will be the answer.
Mourinho had it at Chelsea. why shouldn't i be serious? my standards are high. hence why I don't rate Huddlestone, probablyChelsea, Utd, Arse and City fans would agree. see my post above re "top 4 club" if you still don't understand me
1. Comparing us and our squad/approach to the Abramovich/Etihad funded playthings of Chelsea and City. We all have high standards, but expecting similar squads to them sounds deluded.
2. City don't have 2 world class players in all positions, unless Clichy, Kolarov, Toure, Lescott, Savic, Barry and Milner are world class. That's ignoring players that are better, but to me clearly not world class like Zabaleta, Richards, De Jong etc.
3. Mourinho didn't have 2 world class players for each position. Remind me again what world class striker he had on the bench to replace Drogba?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006%E2%80%9307_Chelsea_F.C._season to see their squad in the 06/07 season. Go ahead, remove the starting 11 from their squad, then pick a team and let me know if that still looks "world class" to you.
4. When top 4 teams buy players it's generally not just players that are good enough for their squad, it's players that are good enough to be clear first choice players to improve their starting 11. Huddlestone might very well be good enough for our squad without being good enough to clearly improve the starting 11 of other top 4 clubs.