braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
Neither would have been particularly good for them imo.i agree about not replacing Lukaku. Iirc they wanted Giroud but Giroud didnt want to leave London. I know the transfer market went beserk in the summer and average players were costing 30-40 mill but there must have been other alternatives they could have gone for.
I was surprised they didnt go for Llorente. I still cant believe he is going to spend a whole season at Spurs with only 5 or 10 mins a game as a sub for Harry. Imo he still has a lot to offer even at his age
Said it before, but I think people underestimate the impact of a complete striker like Lukaku on a team like Everton. Height, power, pace and goal scoring all in one player. Gives so much flexibility for other positions. No pace in attacking midfield, you can get away with that with Lukaku up there. Similar for height, power and goals.
Without pace Giroud and Llorente would have given them many of the same problems they have now.
Koeman was given the task of actually building a functional attacking unit without Lukaku. Not an easy task, but one he's failed at so far. Quite rightly questions are being asked about his choices.