I’m still Ange in. Completely.
It’s about expectations for me. I don’t expect us to win the league. The best we can possibly do as a club is challenge top 4. Is that a great achievement? Is it worth potentially sacrificing attractive football? I’m not sure it is. If you want top 4 consistently, if you believe we can challenge for the league, you’re right to want Ange out. He will not deliver it. It was always fanciful to think that a guy with Ange’s background could do what Conte and Jose failed to do. He won’t. You see that over the last year. We’re too inconsistent.
The reason I want him in is I’m weary of top 4 being some sort of holy grail.
Ange could win a cup. I have serious doubts because I think we’ll crack at crucial moments with how we play…but we can blow any team away on our day. If the stars align, we could win a pot. And that’s kinda what I grew up with from Tottenham and that’s what I was told that Tottenham were as a club when I was a kid.
The way we play is bonkers. Gloriously bonkers. It’s actually even more extreme than Ossie in the 90s. To anyone other than those Spurs fans with expectations of winning the title or challenging top 4, it’s pure entertainment.
I fell in love with Spurs not for league titles or winning the banter war on a Monday. If I wanted that, I’d have supported The Dippers. Spurs to me meant a big club, a good side who played the game a certain way. We’re doing that right now.
Too much in football at the minute is “if you’re not winning, you’re a loser”. Polarised opinions, black and white arguments where everything someone doesn’t do was the right thing. I don’t see Ange as a loser. He won’t win us a league, he may not even last much longer if things don’t pick up but he embodies everything that made me fall in love with the game and the club as a kid. Maybe that’s dumb. Maybe it’s naive. But I love him for having the balls to do it. For me, right now, that’s good enough.