Such a shame African, we always got on so well yet something seems to have happened ever since Harry...ah well, we will find man-love again!!!! ;-) ANYWAY, to take the challenge.
*Burnley away, second leg of the semi-final, 4-4-2, failing miserably, no plan B
*Arsenal away, last season, 4-4-2, we go 2-0 up but are losing the game in midfield and it's only a matter of time before we get taken (something he admitted), no plan B (or to be accurate, no EFFECTIVE plan B)
*Chelski semi-final of the cup, 4-5-1, going OK, some terrible judgments from the ref, we are allowed to fall apart with absolutely nothing coming from the touchline
* Real Madrid away, plan A shot by zealous ref and silly Crouchy, no plan B for this scenario (remember, we did have a similar CL game in Milan, you'd have thought we'd be prepared for this sort of thing after that!)
In response to what he should've done, 4-5-1 at effeminates soon after we went 2 up (been discussed to death), certainly NOT persevere at Madrid with VdV as a lone forward, instead do a Chelski, sit, park the bus in two very organized banks of four and absolutely deny them the space to play...
You know African, I'll take scrutiny all day long. Scrutinize away. But now you answer my points. And furthermore, explain to me how he could've played the likes of Parker to a point where they will now NOT start the season because they were fudged beyond belief, and how we ended up in a situation where we had Sebasstian Bassong, a perfectly FINE CB when we made the CL, yet Harry decided to consistently play Ledders game after game even after EVERYONE saw it was not happening and the boy was badly hurt. He should've had an operation! Now he will retire. Finally, when you HAVE a whole bunch of injured defenders yet you have a whole slew of good midfielders, why could you not work on developing a 3-5-2 or 3-5-1-1 to suit the players you have? I think we know the answer.
Apologies for being part of this thread descending. I suggest we either revive and old thread or start a new one if we want to scrutinize each other beyond glibness and into details, because I'll do it all day long so delighted am I to finally see a man at our club who will prepare and at least go down fighting if, indeed, he goes down at all.
dont remember the burnley game unfortunatley.....especially not in the semi final second leg.
the arsenal game might have been done to death, but fact of the matter is that he switched it up from 442 to a more solid formation. we just got done, it happens...that was his Plan B. it didnt work out. so as far as i can remember he actually had a plan B which had worked against arsenal in the past, yes? you say no effective plan B for that game fair enough..but it was a plan B none the less and if thats how your going to stay about peoples plan B..i expect to brick all over AVB when any of his Plan Bs go down the toilet...if he even has a plan B so to speak
i dont think we persevered at madrid with VDV, we brought on defoe at half time ? i'll got have a look, but i suspect we switched a ball retainer for one that works significantly harder from the front in a 441 formation...edit:- okay jus had a look and it WAS at half time we brought on Defoe..not sure where you got us persevering with VDV tbh. as for the two banks of four...we had modric, bale, sandro and jenas .....how on earth could we NOT have had a two banks of four with those midfielders ..all of whom are studious? (maybe bale aside). our hand were tied in that game with crouch losing his little brain cell and getting a red...and the idea you're going to use THAT game as evidence of a lack of a plan B? this cant be real
the chelsea FA cup game was a bit of a nightmare for me, i confess to not watching it in its entirety , so i'll have to take your word for it
but as far as i can tell , harry has employed a PLan b,...just that you dont like it. He did try to re adjust to a red card against madrid ...it just didnt stop the onslaught...and the chelsea game was a disaster
but in TRUE fashion of someone primarily focusing on reasons to validate their claims...you have picked a 2 games which just happen to be in Harry's worst run, one game where his man gets sent off and he cant stop the second best team IN THE WORLD from taking advantage of us and consequently because of scenarios like those OUTLIERS you deem that this man has NO plan B.
this would be valid points if he showed a consistent trend of no plan B...and yet here i sit, thinking of the many games where we have indeed come back from a deficit, where we have convincingly beaten teams, where we have taken the lead against teams and then shut up shop to claim wins..where we have done this with 10 men even .....i'm stacking them up against those that probably didnt have a desired outcome......and NOT to my surprise the better displays overshadow and engulf the poorer ones
you can focus on the poor run we had and use that as ammunition ...and fish out the bad results from the more evenly spread out good seasons all you want...i'm taking his tenure overall. and the idea that the man has no plan B isnt hanging on my wall
But now you answer my points. And furthermore, explain to me how he could've played the likes of Parker to a point where they will now NOT start the season because they were fudged beyond belief, and how we ended up in a situation where we had Sebasstian Bassong, a perfectly FINE CB when we made the CL, yet Harry decided to consistently play Ledders game after game even after EVERYONE saw it was not happening and the boy was badly hurt. He should've had an operation! Now he will retire. Finally, when you HAVE a whole bunch of injured defenders yet you have a whole slew of good midfielders, why could you not work on developing a 3-5-2 or 3-5-1-1 to suit the players you have? I think we know the answer.
this would be when there was an overlap of sandros injuries , yes? what would you want him to do.....? play livermore and hang our hopes of 4th on those young shoulders? if parker couldnt play i think harry would have known..if parker felt he could play through the injury then that was a choice that both people came together to decide. Harry tried to play his best 11 in order to deliver the target of 4th...trust me when i say that if he hadnt have played parker and we didnt get 4th people from your corner would have found someway to use that against him.
i also particularly liked the way harry FORCED parker at Gunpoint , right up his nostril..the left one, to play for england and play his heart out during the euros even though harry gave parker the well deserved rest when sandro was fully fit. Harry was like "damn man, you still standing? go play for england, make sure you work that achilles to death so that you miss the start of the season"
Bassong wanted to leave. Are you intentionally making these things up or something? Bassong was not happy, he couldnt get into the team that was steam rolling the league..he was lilke 4th or 5th choice and he wanted to leave...and harry let him go. damn that man for being caring ..(actually in all sincerity i think harry should have kept bassong here even though he wasnt happy. sometimes you just have to sacrifice someone's happiness and parts of their career for the good of the team he signed for. he definately should have kept bassong i personally feel)
so now harry redknapp retired ledley king? its harry's fault that ledley keeps breaking down and may have to retire....i'm not going to dignify that with a response . please forgive me , but i think that is absolutely wrong and categorically incorrect. and i think its more mud slinging just to pad out your corner with stuff to validate things you say about HR. F this , every small incident with AVB i'm going to stick it up in the air and tell people to have a good long look....then when hindsight rears its ugly head i'll be like "see, this man is responsible for everything, even things out of his control ".
yes , as for the formation and tactical switch, its easy to do...Just. Like. That.
this is why when chelsea are short on defenders they play bosingwa in CB, or when man united are short on defenders SAF plays carrick in CB or when arsenal are playing on fumes they play players all out of position. But when harry has injuries and thanks to the BIG squad he himself assembled he played people only marginally out of position you take the injuries that hamper his options and you stick the knife in
At the end of all that attempted propaganda and blatant display of lynching i can tell you now that i am absolutely knackered. from day one your corner has not been able to put together anything that IMO is truly worth deeming HR less than a very good manager of men. you take things out of his control and you dump it on his door step and say "sort it out or else its your fault all that happens", you focus on the worst run of his tottenham regime and base a large hypothesis on that run, a very small sample in comparison to all the good he has done.