YesWas it Pritchard's choice to go there over a championship loan? Am I remembering that right?
Yes
That's what was reported
Well I guess he can't really point the finger at anyone else then. You'd have to think he would have got way more minutes if he stayed with us (or moved to a Championship team). Bit of wasted season for him really unfortunately.Yes
That's what was reported
I defended his decision at the time, as I hoped he would get some games against Premier League opposition and that would have been great for him. I am guessing that he hoped for the same thing and maybe he was given some assurances that haven't worked out.
Ideally, we would get him loaned out to someone like Swansea.
I have no problem with him going on loan but ( imo) the team he went to was never going to use him to his strengths. Tony Pullis for Christ's sake.
I agree with that, but if he was given game time, even for a sh1tty Pulis team, he would have still been playing against a level of opposition above anything he's faced so far, which would have been the good point of the move. It's all moot now though. Be interesting if we decide to keep him in the squad next season or loan him out again.
I agree with that, but if he was given game time, even for a sh1tty Pulis team, he would have still been playing against a level of opposition above anything he's faced so far, which would have been the good point of the move. It's all moot now though. Be interesting if we decide to keep him in the squad next season or loan him out again.
All Harry Kane's loans were immenseI don't know why everyone is getting so worked up about this. Sometimes a loan works and sometimes it doesn't.
All Harry Kane's loans were immense
Especially Norwich