Tielemens for £20m seems like a very good deal from a risk/reward perspective. Goes to my point about us seeming to need to have to find the absolutely perfect player/price to act on anything
Or the club just don't rate him as much as you or i do
Tielemens for £20m seems like a very good deal from a risk/reward perspective. Goes to my point about us seeming to need to have to find the absolutely perfect player/price to act on anything
Because we went for Ndombele, instead, perhaps?Not quite sure why we're not onto him. Did really well for Leicester.
Because we went for Ndombele, instead, perhaps?
Or bigger/better targets - hopefullyLeicester fan I work with reckons he is seriously lacking in the effort department so would
Imagine our lack of interest has something to do with that
Not quite sure why we're not onto him. Did really well for Leicester.
Who would be played instead of for us?
When I've watched him I get this impression as well. He has talent, undoubtedly, but he wants it to all come to him, if you know what I mean.Leicester fan I work with reckons he is seriously lacking in the effort department so would
Imagine our lack of interest has something to do with that
Not seen him much but I thought he was more of the Winks / Dembele position. Maddison plays the Erikson roll for them.Eriksen was my thought, for when he is either sold, lacking in effort or tired. But modern football, I know fudge all about it. All these player types and where they supposedly play. I'm out of a the loop. I always thought tielemans was an Am who could play either in the eriksen/Alli role, and be a good squad option for us. Spending 40 mill on squad depth is maybe not what we should do though.
Not seen him much but I thought he was more of the Winks / Dembele position. Maddison plays the Erikson roll for them.
Where's the puke emoji when you need it...