• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Transfer thread

The one that would tick all the boxes. Wouldn't happen for obvious reasons is greenwood. 21 goals this season in 34 games. 5 assists aswell.
 
Raziel said:
He's a standup comic/Spurs fan who used to have rational takes, but has descended into the click bait/narrative takes brick ..

Social media engagement really will be the end of us as a species
Click to expand...
I used to be a slut for ITK type stuff, used to be part of the fun and nonsense of the window

It's now just full of people trying get get easy clicks/money
 
Gutter Boy said:
Not that high tech. Football, along with the NHS and Northern Rail, is famously the institution that keep the fax machine alive.
Click to expand...

And the funeral industry. You try convincing Margaret, an independent funeral arranger in her late 60s in Cornwall that computers are the way forward when faxes get the job done.

I watched the sensible signings for Spurs today, it mentioned that Maddison was our only option as a 10. Can't help but feel they haven't seen Kulu play attacking midfield as the furthest forward in a 3, and Bergvall may come into his own in that position. Then Odobert can play there....I'm not saying we shouldn't sign someone there, but there's definitely options. A proper 6 would be my priority but there's a dedicated thread for that...

It also mentioned the double pivot system Frank favours. Is that just a pretentious way to say a midfield pairing?
 
spurspinter1 said:
And the funeral industry. You try convincing Margaret, an independent funeral arranger in her late 60s in Cornwall that computers are the way forward when faxes get the job done.

I watched the sensible signings for Spurs today, it mentioned that Maddison was our only option as a 10. Can't help but feel they haven't seen Kulu play attacking midfield as the furthest forward in a 3, and Bergvall may come into his own in that position. Then Odobert can play there....I'm not saying we shouldn't sign someone there, but there's definitely options. A proper 6 would be my priority but there's a dedicated thread for that...

It also mentioned the double pivot system Frank favours. Is that just a pretentious way to say a midfield pairing?
Click to expand...

Double pivot generally means a 4-2-3-1. Like we had with Wanyama and Dembele. Usually one is a holder and the other a bit more box-to-box. But there's a definite that they are the two who do the defending, while the ACM does less (compared to a 4-3-3).

All five of Bentancur, Bissouma, Gray, Bergvall and Sarr seem more naturally suited to a double pivot than a single holder system.
 
Gutter Boy said:
Double pivot generally means a 4-2-3-1. Like we had with Wanyama and Dembele. Usually one is a holder and the other a bit more box-to-box. But there's a definite that they are the two who do the defending, while the ACM does less (compared to a 4-3-3).

All five of Bentancur, Bissouma, Gray, Bergvall and Sarr seem more naturally suited to a double pivot than a single holder system.
Click to expand...

So like in a 4-4-2 where one sits and one knits the play together? So like a CM pairing / 2 in midfield?

AI says it means two 6s, but I don't know who is wrong more often between yourself and AI, tough call ha
 
spurspinter1 said:
So like in a 4-4-2 where one sits and one knits the play together? So like a CM pairing / 2 in midfield?

AI says it means two 6s, but I don't know who is wrong more often between yourself and AI, tough call ha
Click to expand...
That's why most coaches don't really care about formations these days: there's little difference between a 4-4-2 with two attacking players on the flanks and one of the forwards coming in deeper and a 4-2-3-1, for instance. It's all about instructions and patterns of play these days.

Even a 4-3-3 can be very similar to a 3-5-2 if you ask your holding midfielder to drop in defence to allow the full-backs more freedom to move forward (I couldn't watch the whole game but I think PSG did something like that when they played that American team in the Club World Cup the other week).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back