Meireles - If studs are your thing, this is your guy. Educated at the Adam and Gerrard school of tackling, this guy is an attacking minded midfielder with a lot of energy. His tackling is dangerous and is somehow more likely to get booked than Paul Scholes. He can score goals, but is played in the holding role most of the time so is limited to hacking and passing, both of which he does to the Chelsea standard.
Lampard - In seasons past, we could count on him getting a scrappy 90th minute goal for Chelsea, but unless he can displace Mata, he's stuck in a holding role under Di Matteo. Penalty taker, scorer of vital goals for Chelsea, can pass a bit... His tackling is pretty poor, but anything worthy of a red is forgiven in the "Lampard and Gerrard are lovable England players and aren't those sort of players" agreement of 2008. He used to score free kicks once, usually gets lots of abuse when taking corners... His runs from deep are still dangerous, despite midfielders being aware that his biggest trick is not being picked up and then scoring a goal.
Maluda - Left winger, AVB didn't seem to like him, was in very good form a long time ago and was one of Chelsea's biggest attacking threats once. Hardly ever plays but when he does, it's usually on the left of Chelsea's front three. He can pass, shoot, cross and do the wingery things you'd expect a winger to do.
Mata - Chelsea's 4-2-3-1 might have been made for him. Earlier in the season, he was Chelsea's brightest star and if it wasn't for Sturridge, he might have been Chelsea's only star. He's been off the pace lately as Silva has for Emirates Marketing Project, but Chelsea's biggest threat is no longer the Lampard 90th minute scrappy goal, it's now this guy. Exceptional passing ability, good at shooting, young (so free of the Chelsea age issue that saps the team late into matches).
-----------
Strikers:
Drogba - Kaboul wins more aerial duels per match than anyone else in the league, or he did a couple of months ago when I last checked, but the reason I mention that is because whoever plays alongside Gallas might have to deal with the aging giant that is Drogba. Shockingly, Chelsea only use 2 strikers as strikers and Drogba is the better of the two. Strength, aerial ability (defending too), lucky lucky crosses that seem to be right all the time and shot power, a lot of shot power. Shot power that sees him take free kicks from further out than most people in world football would try from, shot power that made Gomez look very foolish. A lot of shot power. He used to be one of the best big target men in the world, he's still good. He can't play as much as he used to and Chelsea's game with Barca might tempt Di Matteo into not risking Drogba playing extra time. Also, Lampard is the penalty taker when he plays, but Drogba is a very good penalty taker, Mata is ok, but Drogba and Lampard are better. Drogba tends to roll around on the floor as if he's been shot when anything happens to him at all, I think Bale has been trying to copy him lately... It's not cheating to get someone booked, Drogba does it if no one is around him.
Fernando Torres - Andy Carroll cost Liverpool 35 million pounds, KKKenny's only defence is the bizarre logic that Carroll actually came with 15 million pounds free... But his point is that someone bought him Andy Carroll and 15 million pounds in order to take Fernando Torres away... Chelsea was that someone, while Ronaldo cost 100 million euros and plays as a winger-striker hybrid, he competes for goal scoring records against the best player ever, playing as lone striker in the best team ever. Chelsea decided to pay 50 million pounds for Fernando Torres.
He misses open goals, he can still pass on good days, he can still cross on good days, his first touch can vary, he recently scored after 24 hours of not scoring, he tries hard and puts in some work... What can you say about 50 million pound striker Fernando Torres?
Messi has scored more hat tricks this season than Torres has goals... Torres likes to run in behind though, he does have pace.
Kalou - WTF is this? He's a sort of winger/striker thing. You'd have called him a striker, but since coming to Chelsea he's played on one of the wings in their front three. The reason you'd have called him a striker is because he can't dribble, cross, make a pass that isn't simple, run off the ball or do anything you'd associate with a winger, despite him playing on the wing. He's sort of like Walcott, Walcott has two advantages pace and the ability to shoot with the inside of his foot when inside the box, Kalou does not have that last quality, which is what makes me hesitate before branding him a striker. Kalou is in fact, a striker that cannot shoot. He's small and thus isn't anything like a target man, he's as creative as an outfield player should be, so he's a poacher that can't really poach. If the ball was 3 yards out and we had no players on the pitch, Kalou is the only person that would miss in that position more than Torres. He does score scrappy tap ins and things, but he misses so many chances a goalkeeper should be able to score that I have no idea why he's still at Chelsea.
I honestly have no idea what he does.
Sturridge - Earlier in the season, he was one of Chelsea's biggest attacking threats. Since then, he has lost a bit of his edge. He's a left footed striker that is often played on the right wing in a front three. Greedy, extremely confident and actually a good player. Ramierez took his position on the right wing in order to help Bosingwa with Bale and BAE, Sturridge doesn't track back that well, ABV yelled at him to track back in the Chelsea Man United game, Sturridge listened to his manager and tracked back to give away a penalty, he was then substituted.
On their current form, Chelsea are nowhere near playing with the speed, intensity or desire as Norwich, but they have a few sprinklings of talent that Norwich didn't have and under Di Matteo they have found some luck. But their current form is a guidebook to how to win games while playing very very very badly.
---------------------------
Di Matteo formation of choice: 4-2-3-1. (Used under ABV.)
Previous formations: The Mourinho 4-3-3 (DM on the left, with box-to-box on the right slightly ahead and an attacking midfielder on the left in front of the box-to-box.)
4-1-2-1-2 (4-4-2 diamond.)
ABV 4-5-1 (counter attack)
ABV 4-3-3 (4-3-2-1 triangle midfield and triangle attack.)
----------------------