Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach
Capoue was
Well it's not like Sandro was an option was he?
Capoue was
Well it's not like Sandro was an option was he?
Jonathan Wilson sounds like a little bitch whose belief system gets shaken everytime someone wins playing 442.
Eriksen and Dembele in centre mid, with Sig and Lamela coming narrow from wide areas is, apparently, "a swift blast of Blackburn Rovers circa 1995." Or, "caution-be-damned, early-90s 4-4-2, fill-the-box, want-it-more-boys, drunks-slugging-it-out-in-a-pub-car-park approach." Well then, I guess that's what Pellegrini has been doing too, without knowing it. Or does it just apply to coaches who aren't in Jonathan's 'in-crowd'?
He writes a lot of pseudo-intellectual t0ss, can't stand him. No doubt, that will make a few posters here burst into tears and furiously bang away at the keyboard -- they can also f**k off.
Capoue was
Why so angry?
But don't you realise he cannot succeed, he is just an old boy with no tactical skill, he has sweet talked and manipulated Levy to rise from mere part-time member of the backroom staff to manager!?
I really don't know why these people bother! Sado-masochism perhaps? Attention-whoring? Regardless I think a few of us more rational and less biased posters could do with following the old advice:
View attachment 1760
I guess so, although Sherwood admitted he hadn't seen enough of him. Plus he said he wanted players in there who will keep the ball, not just ones who can win it back - some will like that attitude and some won't I'm sure.
It is a bit like people saying they want to cut the throats of rich people and not even getting a ban, but if another poster had similar about another group of people they would have received a ban. This website has jumped the shark mate.
Yes of course, everything I say should be taken in the utmost seriousness. I've killed at least 10 rich people just today.
Banning you say? You side like one of those EU bureaucrats.
If he can get Eriksen playing like Modric and holding his own in a 4-4-2, then I'll be happy to see that. I think to do that, we need a Siggy or Chadli who give extra cover from the left and can make it 3 in midfield without the ball.
Huddlestone and Modric to many peoples surprise did actually work. It was pretty gung-ho though with:
-----------Pav/Crouch------Defoe------------
Bale------Modric--------Huddlestone---Lennon
It can of course work. I think our front two have to put in one hell of a shift though every game, as they did v Arsenal in that Danny rose game.
A shift in formation has changed a lot within the squad now. Suddenly Siggy, Eriksen, Lamela, Lennon, Townsend, Chadli are all competing for less spaces within the side. Same with Demebele, Sandro, Capoue and Paulinho.
Dry your tears you little girl.
Geezer. Keep on that class fight my friend.
I'm not angry, I just swear a lot. And I dismiss that article, as it's typical of a lot of the crap that he's written.
Blackburn in 1995 played 442, direct football, got it wide to orthodox wingers (Wilcox and Ripley) and had a sturdy central midfield of Sherwood (box to box) and Batty (Holding/defensive player). Shearer and Sutton upfront, that was a typically British 442.
Against Southampton, we played played with 2 wide men who tucked in on their stronger side (Lamela and Sig), with Eriksen and Dembele in midfield. Eriksen is a pure passer, and Dembele is quite adventurous, even as the most defensive of the midfielders starting.
The whole article reeks of snobbery: "How dare Spurs appoint someone who doesn't talk about the game the way I think it should be talked about. I'll just write up about drunks in a carpark and Blackburn in 1995"
Ignoring the fact that Emirates Marketing Project have played a 442 this season and have also had a certain lack of caution in their approach. Their wide players tuck in narrow, their fullbacks attack and their central midfielders can pass/score and do a bit of everything. Now they have better players and a better balance in midfield than we currently do, but I don't see any accusations of "442 fahkin run about a bit lads" levelled at Pellegrini. And they have Negredo, who is far nearer to Shearer/Sutton style than anybody we have upfront. But that's because of the snobbery that oozes out of pr1cks like Wilson and his ilk.
Football management recently had become a game for smart, young, clever men who espouse theories of play and specialize in analyzing data: the focus is far more on the management than on the football. It's no longer about instinct, having a feel for the game, knowing which players need an arm around the shoulder and which a slap in the face to get them going. And there is resistance to that, partly because football is an instinctively conservative game and partly because British society generally is suspicious of intellectualism.
If he can get Eriksen playing like Modric and holding his own in a 4-4-2, then I'll be happy to see that. I think to do that, we need a Siggy or Chadli who give extra cover from the left and can make it 3 in midfield without the ball.
Huddlestone and Modric to many peoples surprise did actually work. It was pretty gung-ho though with:
-----------Pav/Crouch------Defoe------------
Bale------Modric--------Huddlestone---Lennon
It can of course work. I think our front two have to put in one hell of a shift though every game, as they did v Arsenal in that Danny rose game.
A shift in formation has changed a lot within the squad now. Suddenly Siggy, Eriksen, Lamela, Lennon, Townsend, Chadli are all competing for less spaces within the side. Same with Demebele, Sandro, Capoue and Paulinho.
Its ironic, the same people that were telling those AVB 'haters' to give it time, are the ones who are moaning about Timmy boy without giving him a chance let alone time. Utterly pathetic as far as im concerned and realy have shown themselves up. All for petty pathetic reasons such as (and im paraphrasing here) 'I dont like how he looks' - ****ing hell.
I hope he gets us top four and ill back him from the start.
But don't you realise he cannot succeed, he is just an old boy with no tactical skill, he has sweet talked and manipulated Levy to rise from mere part-time member of the backroom staff to manager!?
I really don't know why these people bother! Sado-masochism perhaps? Attention-whoring? Regardless I think a few of us more rational and less biased posters could do with following the old advice:
View attachment 1760
I probably wouldn't persist with Eriksen there purely because I don't trust any of our other options to consistently deliver on the left, I can take Sigurdsson occasionally and Chadli if he performs like he did on Sunday but as you know, the team I've wanted to see was Sandro and Dembele central with Lamela right and Eriksen left tucked in - not in all games, but at home generally and in some away games. Tim's first game in charge(I don't count West Ham) had us set up as close to that as we've seen all season so I'm very enthused that we'll see the above in future. I think another comment which you agreed with me on was that I want to see Eriksen, Lamela and Soldado play every(or as near to) game from now on, under AVB the three had never been on the pitch together, whilst Sherwood did it in game 1, plus bringing Ade back which was another thing I'd wanted to happen. So yeah, I'm very pleased so far and that's without mentioning the ballsy move to bring on a kid into a game like that, AVB(sorry to keep coming back to him, I'll stop after this) wouldn't even risk it in a couple of redundant Europa League games but instead chose to wear out the likes of Dembele again who really could've done with putting his feet up at home.
It's even accepted when one says he'd rather we lose when Sherwood is in charge. Can you imagine the reaction if an 'anti' AVB poster said this when he first arrived?
GB literally got nobody (but me) questioning his ridiculous posts about wanting Southampton and WBA to win. Would this be the case if i stated in an OMT how much i wanted us to lose when AVB was in charge? would it ****.
I do not want to respond to you and shall not do so again but i stand by everything i said in my post. If you have a problem contact an mod/admin. People of a different political view get banned for that but under Milo and steffs watch that would never happen. This site jumped the shark and is not impartial.