Re: O/T Manager Sack Watch
Different yes, unrelated no. And yes. Lived in Italy for a time, speak the lingo, understand the specific history of the place that caused the ideology of fascism to come into existence.
Busy day today, so no time to get into any great political discussion.
It is basically a question of words and using them correctly and not mashing things together to create a language of Orwellian Newspeak notoriety.
It's like the question of when do the differences that evolve in all living organisms over time become sufficient to be worthy of creating a different name for them or even classifying them as a different species? Easy to answer if you're a Jehovah's Witness. More difficult if you're not.
I also dislike the tendency of some more right wing people to use terms like Leftie and Commie for the wide variety of differing ideologies that evolved from the work of great thinkers such as Marx and Engels.
I have many reasons to despise the Nazis, the obvious ones such the mass murder of millions, the attempted genocide of a race of people that has included some of the greatest people who have ever lived. The bombing of my city and my country. The cultural destruction caused by the stupid war they started. The misappropriation of the works of Nietzsche, which caused his reputation to be unfairly sullied for generations after... need I go on?
I don't believe the original ideology of Fascism born in Italy should be associated with these crimes.
Clear enough for you?
I agree with the first point in bold above. It's important. Further, it plays into the second point (which is something that I despise -how the words 'communism' and 'socialism' have been totally misinterpreted -purposefully to my mind- by people who simply want to see no form of socially-minded/empathetic government in their society).
Your Nietzsche comment is a whole other discussion; I'd say there were others (such as Marx) who's philosophies have been misappropriated far more.
As for your final comment? Yes, there is a fine line difference between fascism and racism. But you're talking academic definitions. And by your own stipulated dislike of misappropriation, fascism was adopted by racists virtually from the get-go. Thus a modern 'fascist' and 'patriot' is, by the mere stacking of what those terms mean when put together, going to end up harboring some racist ideals (for example, that Italian fascists felt colonizing African nations was justified because of the superior intellect' of the colonizers).
The big question would be why Paulo Di Canio would (with all this wonderful nuanced information) offer a nazi salute not once but several times from pitch-side?
Are we now saying that before we condemn someone for throwing out that insulting gesture that we should discuss whether they are, in fact, non-racist fascists?
Given the fact that we have confirmed that fascism and nazism are related, you'd have to conclude that Paulo Di Canio is naive if he thinks he can exercise his right to offer a 'Nazi-style' salute, state that he believe in Italian fascism and not cop a good deal of flack for it.
The fact he stubbornly refuses to conclusively wipe the slate clean suggests he is either a stubborn idiotic loopy tool or a man of strong principle and moral fibre...I know what I think...