• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The transfer thread

Yes, for better or worse.

Personally I think worse as our backup players are way too inexperienced and not yet ready for much PL football (if we want to be successful anyway). Though, as I have said many times, if we really are taking a medium to long term view, where we're happy to miss Europe for a year, while we build and develop a young squad of talent to get back in the year later when having fewer games but then really being able to have a crack at doing something significant the year after that then great. I'm all for it.
Probably cost us in the first half of the season. They weren't (seen as) ready for much PL involvement. As they've settled in and gotten more game time I think they've shown themselves to be useful squad players. If they keep developing and increasing their impact this season without having to be trusted to start most games perhaps even more useful. For better and worse, like most things.
 
That doesn't matter a jot mate. "Signing on fees" are spread across the contract and paid as a 'loyalty bonus' (player forgoes that element if they put in a written transfer request and are then sold but are due their remaining 'loyalty bonus' installments if they are sold without putting in a written transfer request (though typically there is just a negotiation on both sides instead of a written request going in).

When people talk about £100k a week wage (or whatever amount) that is actually the wage and the loyalty bonus element factored in.

IF you give a player a 5 year deal on £80k a week and a signing on fee of £20m, you are basically just giving them £160k a week (and that is what would be leaked by the agent as the player 'wage').
Yes that’s how I understood it
What I meant was selling a free signing later you would use that to offset their wages to help them go
Say they were owed £3m in signing on fees but they cost you nothing… you pay that to them
 
I know he's never been the fittest player, but it seems a bit over the top to start calling Grealish names, he's not gone full Andy Reid just yet

Is Hoddle's son coming out of retirement? We need to hide the ketchup at the training ground.
 
I know he's never been the fittest player, but it seems a bit over the top to start calling Grealish names, he's not gone full Andy Reid just yet
Andy Reid! Who was the other one we got from Forest, as part of the deal was it Dawson? Or am I making that up?
Or am I thinking of tacoface Etherington and Davies?
 
Andy Reid! Who was the other one we got from Forest, as part of the deal was it Dawson? Or am I making that up?
Or am I thinking of tacoface Etherington and Davies?

I thought Etherington and Davies came the same summer as Doherty and Gardner. Pleat's finest hour.

I think it was Dawson and Reid that came as a package.

I'll always have a soft spot for Dawson, the great man, but know that the footballer wasn't good enough for what we needed for a decade.
 
I thought Etherington and Davies came the same summer as Doherty and Gardner. Pleat's finest hour.

I think it was Dawson and Reid that came as a package.

I'll always have a soft spot for Dawson, the great man, but know that the footballer wasn't good enough for what we needed for a decade.
It was Dawson and Reid, about 15-20m for the pair and the bulk of the fee was for Reid.
 
I thought Etherington and Davies came the same summer as Doherty and Gardner. Pleat's finest hour.

I think it was Dawson and Reid that came as a package.

I'll always have a soft spot for Dawson, the great man, but know that the footballer wasn't good enough for what we needed for a decade.

Lol. You might want to relook at that. 20 years apart those signings.
 
Dawson and one of his Forest teammates, winger Andy Reid, signed for Premier League club Tottenham Hotspur on 31 January 2005

Doherty was bought by Luton old boy David Pleat then Director of Football at Tottenham Hotspur for £1million in March 2000.

Gardner signed for George Graham's Tottenham Hotspur in January 2000 for a fee of £855,000.[5] He had been scouted by director of football David Pleat.[2] Gardner worked his way up through the reserve team before making his debut as a substitute against Derby County in March 2001

at the end of December 1999, Etherington joined Tottenham Hotspur in a deal that valued him at £500,000.[4] He made a total of 58 appearances for Peterborough in all competitions, scoring six goals.[4]
Etherington joined Tottenham in a move that saw Simon Davies join the North London club as part of the same deal.
 
Dawson and one of his Forest teammates, winger Andy Reid, signed for Premier League club Tottenham Hotspur on 31 January 2005

Doherty was bought by Luton old boy David Pleat then Director of Football at Tottenham Hotspur for £1million in March 2000.

Gardner signed for George Graham's Tottenham Hotspur in January 2000 for a fee of £855,000.[5] He had been scouted by director of football David Pleat.[2] Gardner worked his way up through the reserve team before making his debut as a substitute against Derby County in March 2001

at the end of December 1999, Etherington joined Tottenham Hotspur in a deal that valued him at £500,000.[4] He made a total of 58 appearances for Peterborough in all competitions, scoring six goals.[4]
Etherington joined Tottenham in a move that saw Simon Davies join the North London club as part of the same deal.

Which doherty? Matt was in 2020. Am i forgetting one?
 
Back