I see the praise is starting for Van Commenee.....after they were trying to slag him over his handling of Idowu!
Great Britain’s success on the track is symptomatic of a new, ruthless outlook enforced by the head coach of UK Athletics
By producing three champions in the Olympic Stadium within 45 minutes on “Super Saturday”, British athletics chiefs can claim to have finally found a winning formula to begin to match the success seen in cycling and rowing.
The success of Jessica Ennis, Mo Farah and Greg Rutherford is symptomatic of a new, ruthless approach by Charles van Commenee, the UK Athletics (UKA) head coach, and an emphasis on the best back-up staff money can buy.
After Beijing, where Britain won only one athletics gold medal, the sport’s chiefs returned home in introspective mood. Christine Ohuruogu’s victory in the 400 metres, to add to two silver and one bronze, had saved UK Athletics from a major disaster, but it was still an underperformance that merited serious analysis after a public investment of £26.5 million in the four-year cycle.
The first move by Niels de Vos, the UKA chief executive, was to poach Van Commenee from the Dutch Olympic team to spearhead an “evolution” in a sport that had a rich history of producing Olympic champions but struggled to maintain any kind of consistency in the professional era.
The man who coached Denise Lewis to her heptathlon gold medal at the Sydney Games in 2000 had a no-nonsense reputation. He didn’t mind rocking a few boats and embarked on a shake-up to centralise, control and cajole.
An Olympic task force, steered by Van Commenee and De Vos, streamlined a regionalised structure of seven high-performance centres to just two, at Loughborough and Lee Valley. They recruited the best available coaches, nutritionists, physiotherapists, psychologists and medics.
They had to be more focused after UK Sport, which distributes lottery and Exchequer money, cut their funding by about £1 million a year. So they threw the weight of their resources behind a nucleus of about 20 athletes who were identified as Olympic finalists.
“The problem with a sport as broad as athletics has always been spreading the jam too thinly,” De Vos said. “We concentrated on much fewer high quality support staff for the top athletes. That was key.”
In the case of Rutherford, his gold can be attributed to eradicating his injuries to ensure that he could realise his talent when it mattered. The difference for Rutherford — after 17 hamstring tears in his career — came in the form of Dan Pfaff, his coach, and Gerry Ramogida, a performance therapist with the Seattle Seahawks American football team.
For Farah, what was important was the freedom to base himself in Portland, Oregon, to work with Alberto Salazar, the three-time New York marathon winner. The move was sanctioned by Ian Stewart, UKA’s endurance coach and one of the world’s leading distance runners in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
In the same way, Ennis and Toni Minichello, her coach, were trusted to get on with what they did best from a satellite operation in Sheffield.
“It’s still early days, but they have learnt lessons from other sports,” Liz Nicholl, UK Sport chief executive, said. “Before Beijing there were a lot of athletes and coaches working in isolation. They have found a formula that works, which is built on a system but takes a flexible approach.”
The prospect of Farah’s victory in the 10,000 metres being just the first taste of a resurgence in distance running is tantalising. Salazar even talked of an “Anglo-American alliance” that could lead to more endurance athletes going to Portland to train. “We’ve got the model, we just need the support to duplicate it to get more young Brits, more young Americans in good programmes like we’re running together,” he said. “I think we can have more of this.”
Overseas training camps are already well established within the system. Two altitude training camps, in Iten, in Kenya, and Font Romeu, in the Pyrenees, cost about £300,000 a year to run. Funded by London Marathon and UK Athletics, they are available to all endurance runners.
“The philosophy is not new — 30 or 40 years ago, athletes were doing it but off their own back. The young runners now take it as the norm,” De Vos said. “But you have to know how to do it. Coming down at the right time is crucial. You could argue that Mo got it wrong before Beijing. You have to get it right.”
Before the weekend, Van Commenee said he believed he had 15 athletes capable of winning a medal. Indeed, he said he would quit if his team failed to win eight — at least one of them gold.
While all sports chiefs will say you cannot do anything without raw talent, David Hemery, Britain’s 1968 Olympic 400 metres hurdles champion, singles out Van Commenee as a major factor in British success. “We have a head coach that doesn’t take prisoners,” he said. “That could be a two-edged sword, but if the rest of the Games delivers like that, I should think he will be knighted even though he’s Dutch.”
From The Times today