These are all facts that's already established through media and other ITKs.
****!!!
I don't understand - you hate the guy and think he's a flimflamer, yet you insist on pasting his vomit on here daily, only to slag it yourself?
/mind blown
These are all facts that's already established through media and other ITKs.
****!!!
The 2nd player competing for the same spot - as it is with most top/successful clubs
I don't understand - you hate the guy and think he's a flimflamer, yet you insist on pasting his vomit on here daily, only to slag it yourself?
/mind blown
who the hell is dark blue?
who the hell is dark blue?
who the hell is dark blue?
So we're going to have Parker, Sandro, M'Vila/Capoue and Livermore competing for the same spot. When we desperately need strikers, a wide player and a central ball player? Yes, I can definitely see how we NEED either of them, fudge it why not just get both.
This isn't about signing - you mentioned 'needing' - to which I replied, yes we need a long-term Parker replacement. I see Livermore as a box-to-box midfielder anyway.
There I agree. I find him constantly being pigeon holed as a DM somewhat lazy and frustrating.
This is an utter shambles of a window.
Deja vu...
There I agree. I find him constantly being pigeon holed as a DM somewhat lazy and frustrating.
Its no different to the last about 10 shambles of a window from our perspective