The thing is Joe Cole is nothing remotely like Lennon or Bale. There is a reason why Liverpool got rid of him and even in France he was not consistent enough to start every week. I would rather sack Harry then sign Cole. There are younger players with more potential available like Moses and Hoilett.
Why the notion that every player we sign should single handedly get us CL qualification?
Fletcher is a very good player, composed and intelligent (particularly in his movement). As a squad striker he would have made a huge impact on our season. Its a simple statement and one I believe to be true.
I havent promoted him as better than those you mention, in fact I havent promoted him at all aside from saying he would have made an impact and I certainly havent mentioned the others.
The Fletcher rumour was put up, some posters scoffed at the idea (snobbery IMO, being boring old relegated Wolves players), I said I think he could be a good move.
As to Moses/Hoilett etc, I dont disagree - but again they also werent mentioned or compared in anyway. A link to Jarvis was posted and I commented on it.
Jarvis is a decent winger, can find the goal but more importantly plays for the team and crosses very well. Had we had him in the squad when Bale was unfit he would have made a big contribution IMHO.
It's a good thing Cole isn't like Lennon or Bale. Teams know that our wingers are all about pace, if you nullify the space in behind the defence Bale and Lennon offer very little else as they don't have the skills to beat a player one on one (in general, obviously not saying they never have). Cole offers something different that we don't have ie actual ball skills.....
Steven fletcher has a poor career goal scoring record in this league, not the kind of player that will get you into the CL
As for Javis, I simply look at the kid Hoilett and see so much more potential
Load of nonsense. 30 goals in 96 games. 1 in 3, for Burnley and Wolves - hardly teams who create 10 good chances each week. He's hit double figures in the league in both seasons at Wolves.
Personally, I'd take him - I think he'd go for about ?ú7m if offered - and it would be a steal. Notice how most of his goals are tap ins, or headers - something we notoriously have sucked at the last 2 or 3 years.
L'Equipe reporting that Hazard has chosen...
chelsea. definitely not for the money.
.
Why would you choose Chelsea over CIty or United if it wasnt for the money, seriously you wouldnt, fudge right off
yeah who in their right mind would join the reigning European Champions !
Anyone who didn't watch how they won it.
Playing time and he wants to play in his favoured position(#10), guess Utd and City couldn't guarantee that.
Anyone who didn't watch how they won it.
Maybe I just think I there are a number of superior players out there on teh market if we look hard enough.
Also, it is all very well and good for people to take player x as a backup, but remember when Ade was out injured, all of a sudden Saha that people seemed to be happy to have as a backup all of a sudden did not look such a good idea when we had to rely on him for goals.
As for Cole, his lack of pace is not the problem for me. I honestly do not think he has become half the player he looked he would as a youngster. Both Chelsea and Liverpool found that out which is why he spent last season in France, and on ?ú100k a week? WTF?