papaspur
Kasey Keller
where does the 5.5m come from?
SSN and BBC, from what I've seen. Not sure if the bid's been accepted or not though.
where does the 5.5m come from?
So it only took us 3 months to get a player that we clearly wanted, his club wanted to get rid of and he clearly wanted to come. Shouldn't be a problem to sign the absolute essentials of another striker, a winger and a replacement for Modric within 10 days then!
SSN and BBC, from what I've seen. Not sure if the bid's been accepted or not though.
fudgein hope not for that price, he's much more valuable than that, unless he's only got something like 18 months left on his contract.
[-o<I find it funny that the anything 'Official' to do with Spurs has said 'more to come soon!' in a transfer update. That is waaaaaaay out of character. Pretty much confirming someone else pretty noteworthy should be coming very soon.
Everyone's seems obsessed re: high line as AVB's only formation and supposedly how Dawson will not fit into it. I'm sorry but 1 tactic will not win anything. The key to winning things in this league is mixing it up a bit not slavishly following a tactic. It won AVB nothing at Chelsea. Posters happy to get rid of Dawson, Club captain, England centreback more proven than Kaboul, Vertongen and Caulker put together. AVB imho will be making a big mistake. That's not nostalgia that is common sense.
I find it funny that the anything 'Official' to do with Spurs has said 'more to come soon!' in a transfer update. That is waaaaaaay out of character. Pretty much confirming someone else pretty noteworthy should be coming very soon.
@SpursOfficial said:Read more about the deal to bring @Sheyiadebayor back to the Club: http://bit.ly/Pu977T - Welcome back Ade! #COYS
How much was Vertongen?
Surely Dawson is worth as much.
Proven Premiership and English and still relatively young for a Center Back.
However, he admitted that the 9 shirt is the target of harassment strong.
----------------
No idea what their source is, don't see us breaking the bank, especially before Modric moves.
In interviews the other week Huddlestone basically said his ankle would never be right and would need to be "managed" (ala Ledley?) but he thought he should be able to play regularly.
Given that he hasnt played for a full year, and there are perhaps question marks about the durability of the ankle would it not make sense to loan him? Until Jan at least?
That said I can well imagine AVB just doesnt see him fitting into his high line/high pressing game.
eh?
EDA = ADE
Anyway if we sell Dawson it will be Gallas, Kaboul, Vertonghen and Caulker for the season which is fine imo. Selling Jenas and letting Huddlestone go is also fine with me but is Luka replacement, Sandro, Parker, and Livermore enough for the season? i'm leaning towards no.
even thinking about this thing logically it doesnt make sense at all to me
if there are questions about his ankle and you want him in your plans..dont you test him out under your own roof? it makes no sense at all to send someone thats firmly in your plans away on loan. if you are sending him on loan your basically saying he can play. why not play for you that guy that has him in the plans.....
do you have a link to any of his interviews where he said that his ankle would never be right again. i want to see if i can get the tone of the article
it doesnt make sense to me at all
How did it work at Porto? And do Barca play one way? Seems to work for them?