I wonder if we've simply said you can't sign Modric until we have a replacement ready to sign
Or I wonder whether this new "information" is complete gonads.
What's the source? How trustworthy is it?
Has the deal really hit a new stumbling block? If so, how do we know that it isn't Madrid or Modric who have moved the goalposts?
Or is there no new stumbling block at all but merely, as you say, a delay that was always possible under the terms of the original agreement (assuming that that, too, had been reached as reported)?