So let me get this straight, if we paid £13m for Soldado upfront with the rest being targets, do we still pay the rest if he is sold?
So let me get this straight, if we paid £13m for Soldado upfront with the rest being targets, do we still pay the rest if he is sold?
Depends on the clauses in the contract, no way to know for sure.
So let me get this straight, if we paid £13m for Soldado upfront with the rest being targets, do we still pay the rest if he is sold?
That would be on anything above the 13m we spent. surely levy is to smart to have it any other way.
I alluded to this earlier and I couldnt say for certain but I would imagine that there is a penalty akin to perhaps early repayments on a loan etc. I imagine it could and would be around 10% or so but thats an assumption.
I'm guessing the Valencia negotiators aren't exactly idiots.
If there was a clause about X number of goals this season, or CL qualification this season that wasn't met and we wouldn't have to pay it.
If there was a clause about X number of games for the club there might have been a clause triggered by him being sold before Y number of years. If there was a clause about X number of goals over the next 2-3 years or CL qualification during that time there might be a sum to be paid if he's sold before that time period ends. And so on and so on.
Personally I doubt that if we only paid £13m and the rest was performance dependent it was all based on this one season. Just basing that on a guess as it seems like a very high variance gamble for Valencia to accept that. I'm also guessing that if we sell him this summer, and the £13m number is correct that we'll have to pay at least something more to Valencia. If not they've put themselves in a very weird situation when selling him.
Personally i think we paid 26m...but in the infamous Levy installments (over something stupid like 5 years). Valencia stated many times they're not going to sell for a penny less than his release clause. They also stated (during negotiations) that the only thing stopping the deal going through was the payment structure.
Personally i think we paid 26m...but in the infamous Levy installments (over something stupid like 5 years). Valencia stated many times they're not going to sell for a penny less than his release clause. They also stated (during negotiations) that the only thing stopping the deal going through was the payment structure.
same here, I think it's just wishful thinking by some saying we end up paying half that. No way Valencia would have let him go for 13m
People haven't just imagined this scenario though, I've seen several reports mentioning it, one this week in the Evening Standard for example. So it's not like it's being dreamt up in some kind of face saving exercise - there's ligetimate reason to base that opinion.
Newspapers always report the headline figure, yet i haven't seen one report explicity stating it was 26m in full and so it stands to reason, imv, that if there are reports saying the deal was brokered in installments or target based then there's probably more reason to accept this as the truth than otherwise.
Yeah clubs say a lot of things when selling/buying players, as we should know. We should also know that circumstamces behind the scenes can change