• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Richarlison

thfcsteff said:
Really? A 'credible person'?

https://www.borgenmagazine.com/richarlisons-charity-work/

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/1978843/2020/08/07/richarlison-story-everton-brazil-no9/

https://www.olympics.com/en/news/richarlison-exclusive-now-i-know-the-weight-that-ronaldo-carried

Cancer Patient Housing: Donates 10% of his Tottenham Hotspur salary to the Father Roberto Lettieri Institute (Instituto Padre Roberto Lettieri) in Barretos, São Paulo, which provides free housing, meals, transportation, and support for cancer patients and their families undergoing treatment at the Hospital de Amor.

COVID-19 & Flood Relief: Distributed thousands of food parcels, funded oxygen cylinders for hospitals in Manaus during severe shortages, and provided care packages during regional floods.

Public Advocacy: Uses his platform to speak out on social issues including racism, poverty, police brutality, LGBTQ+ rights, gender violence, and environmental protection

Yeah. I think Richy's done more than enough to show he's a 'credible person'.
Click to expand...

I stand by what I said Steff. This social media offload stuff is incredibly important in our society and is getting worse. You can be an absolute saint in life (as you show above) but when the pressure is on you personally then you still need to show as much credibility. Richi didn't, like so mnay others. He just ran to social media, vented and in my opinion massively let himself down. It is therefore a question mark on his credibility under pressure. That's often when it is most important in life.

Be interesting to see whether he has one of those clauses "The views posted on here are those of the individual and not the employer etc...". We used to be given clauses to add to our social media in corporate that both reminded us that we should always behave well and also protected the brand of the companies we worked for.

The other problem is Richi didn't just do it once. Within a week or so he was goading Roberto with his follow up. He'll do it again no doubt.
 
DTA said:
Still better than anyone else we have right?
Click to expand...
It's debatable to me as he adds an many problems if not more then he solves and he's doesn't even solve anything.

I think give Marmoush a season up top and he can match Richy's numbers, quite easily imo. Richy doesn't actually score many.
 
Muttley said:
I stand by what I said Steff. This social media offload stuff is incredibly important in our society and is getting worse. You can be an absolute saint in life (as you show above) but when the pressure is on you personally then you still need to show as much credibility. Richi didn't, like so mnay others. He just ran to social media, vented and in my opinion massively let himself down. It is therefore a question mark on his credibility under pressure. That's often when it is most important in life.

Be interesting to see whether he has one of those clauses "The views posted on here are those of the individual and not the employer etc...". We used to be given clauses to add to our social media in corporate that both reminded us that we should always behave well and also protected the brand of the companies we worked for.

The other problem is Richi didn't just do it once. Within a week or so he was goading Roberto with his follow up. He'll do it again no doubt.
Click to expand...

I agree with you. First of all, very happy to state Richy is a good person. And also to say that the actual words used in his posts aren’t egregious on their own.

But it’s the context that makes them very bad. For someone in his position there are simply higher standards of behaviour expected in that moment, and he failed to meet those standards.

Even if you agree with his stance of not wanting to be told where to move - and frankly I can see where he’s coming from - I’m just not sure why it needed to be broadcast on social media? Could it not have been communicated directly to the clubs?
 
SissokoWasGood (BoL) said:
I agree with you. First of all, very happy to state Richy is a good person. And also to say that the actual words used in his posts aren’t egregious on their own.

But it’s the context that makes them very bad. For someone in his position there are simply higher standards of behaviour expected in that moment, and he failed to meet those standards.

Even if you agree with his stance of not wanting to be told where to move - and frankly I can see where he’s coming from - I’m just not sure why it needed to be broadcast on social media? Could it not have been communicated directly to the clubs?
Click to expand...

He was getting flak for scuppering the Ndiaye deal - i can see why he felt the need to put his side out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back