Yes, but two of them were away from home. Sunderland and QPR had terrific home records when we pulled up in town. I'd actually say one point from those two matches IS standard form for a team finishing 3rd to 6th. Stoke and Norwich were poor results. Stoke we played well, Norwich we did not.
Standard form will never happen to any team throughout the season, as thankfully there are always shocks. We aren't title contenders, and never were so therefore our deviation away from standard results was always going to be likely at some stage of the season.
People talk about dropped points, but what about points gained? A win against Fulham at their place (standard result would be a loss or a draw), or the point against Chelsea (standard result is a loss) or even beating Bolton in the run in (standard result would be a draw)?
I don't really know what I'm trying to argue, as I don't blame Harry. I blame the speculation leading to a lack of confidence, and also utterly horrendous luck. But I just think we could have done slightly better...somewhere. A drop from 42 to 27 points from one half of the season to the other is crazy, when you see that the other teams roughly levelled out.
One of the commentators on FSC makes a good point about scenarios like this
- Should the speculation have affected our results or players that badly, no absolutely not.
- Do players allow themselves that as an excuse? yes
I actually think the fact that quite a few of the games we got poor results from (either draw/loss), we didn't play that badly (1 or 2 exceptions) actually aggravated the issue. Instead of players just admitting they weren't good enough (e.g. didn't convert 1 out of 500 chances), they used the excuse of "well we are distracted by all this uncertainty"
So even though I back Harry, he has to shoulder some of that blame, he has to be the one to hold them to that "results just aren't good enough"
May I suggest the only way to resolve all this hullabaloooooooooooo?
We fight. Pro Harry v Harry Haters
I really do think this is the only way to resolve this matter.
The forfeit for the losers would be to get Bukkake'd (preferebly at the opening home game of 12/13 at half time in the middle of the centre circle)
Fine by me. You'd have to catch me though
but his post wasn't a dig either?
wtf are you feeling well today? or is there something wrong.
Don't really doubt you to be honest, although I also don't believe that the players consciously thought 'brilliant, we've yet again dropped points but it doesn't matter because I can blame it on the manager not really caring because he's going to England' or anything like that.
During that speculation and subsequent bad form, the players got edgy. The passing wasn't as crisp. Frustration started to show easier. I don't think it was conscious, and I think that they wanted to win, and for guys like Kyle Walker and Sandro the opportunity to play in the CL again, when they know they probably wouldn't be able to force a move in the summer regardless, would have been important for them because they are good players.
I'd love to see a study on this, or some sort of psychologist come out with some insight into it. I just think that when form is good and confidence is high - in any walk of life - your mind is clear. You don't have to think. Everything comes naturally. Whether it's playing football at an elite level or going on the pull with your mates. If your mind is clear, the funny lines come out easier, and you have the balls to say that cheeky thing that might get you slapped but more than likely will have her laughing in hysterics. If you've just been made redundant the day before the lads holiday to Ibiza you're probably more than likely to have a bricky time because it's on your mind no matter how much you want it not to be.
And I think it's the same with our players. They weren't afforded the luxury of having a clear mind before they went out on the pitch, because it's an unsettling thing. If the manager who is giving you the instructions may be leaving, it makes you wonder whether you'll be at the club next season, whether a new man will rate you, whether the club might be starting a downward curve. They started snatching at shots, being slower with their passing, and letting their frustrations show. The killer pass or the perfect shot that seems to easy when everything around the club is settled just isn't coming, and everything seems like much more hard work.
It shouldn't have an effect, absolutely not. But I think it does. And not neccesarily because it's an excuse, but because it's an unsettling effect. So many games seemed to be in the second half of the season 'they closed off all the gaps and we just couldn't find any space to play in, we camped in their half for the whole game but just couldn't find a way through, we couldn't have done anymore' but it was no different in the first half of the season. Teams would still try and frustrate us but it didn't matter. Villa came to us and played with full backs as wide midfielders, absolutely looking to just stop us scoring. But we played a great game against them. The players suddenly lost the ability to break those teams down and I'd say it was largely down to not having the clear head that allows the creative instincts to flow naturally, and it was those instincts we needed to break down teams. It wasn't because of a lack of effort that saw teams outplay us, it was simply uninspired attacking play.
It's not about anti-Redknapp, it's about pro-Spurs.
It's not about anti-Redknapp, it's about pro-Spurs.
Do not let facts get in the way of the ranters.
The facts are simple. We finished 4th. It's our joint highest finishing position in the Premiership. We've finished top six (five!) for three consecutive seasons for the first time in donkeys years. The facts are simple, we're doing very well indeed!
I struggle to see that logic personally. A lot of those wanting Redknapp out are happy for an inferior Manager to come in and us drop down the table in the name of "long term" improvement. Makes no sense to me at all.
How do you know it would be an 'inferior' manager?
You make it sound like Arry is the be all and end all of the Spurs managerial pinnacle
How do you know it would be an 'inferior' manager?
You make it sound like Arry is the be all and end all of the Spurs managerial pinnacle
There arent many Managers who will get us into the top four. Harry has been tried and tested with us and has had a good track record for the past three n a bit years. He is much lower risk than the other candidates. Unless it is someone who has established himself such as Ancelotti, Mourinho etc then im sticking with Harry even if it is just another year.
Levy I am sure is gonna stick with Harry - why would he spend the money this summer then? Why buy Vertonghen or Remy etc if he 'knows' Harry will be leaving in a year? wasnt this the same excuse that people are bringing up for not spending last summer? why Levy didnt spend on the players we needed?
dont let the facts get in the way of the tossers