thfcsteff
George Hunt
What about taking the country to war based on intelligence that was believed at the time?
Because that's what the report says.
The bible says Mary was a virgin, etc, etc...
What about taking the country to war based on intelligence that was believed at the time?
Because that's what the report says.
There's a huge difference between a lie and a mistake. The Chilcot report is very clear about that.
I believe in the evidence presented until better evidence comes along.Do you believe in fairys as well.
I believe in the evidence presented until better evidence comes along.
One thing I absolutely don't buy into is conspiracy theories.
And there has since been plenty of alternative evidence (my favourite is the suggestion that virgin is just a mistranslation of "young girl" making Joseph and GHod paedos along with Muhammed).The bible says Mary was a virgin, etc, etc...
Yet you believe in a grand conspiracy to go to war in order to award construction contracts to friendly companies?Well at least we can agree on that, neither do i.
Had I lived 700 years ago I'd probably have believed the bible as little alternative evidence was around.
Get ready for wannabe Maggie II
May or Leadsom the!
The best.at least they start with a good role model
Yet you believe in a grand conspiracy to go to war in order to award construction contracts to friendly companies?
Can you see the discrepancy there?
at least they start with a good role model
No, someone lied to the security services about WMD.You are putting words in my mouth now, he lied about the weapons of mass destruction.
No, someone lied to the security services about WMD.
MI6/Blair simply failed to question it.
It's going to be a bit thatcher vs foot again isn't it.